MHB Finding local extrema using taylor series

Click For Summary
To find local extrema using Taylor series, the discussion centers on the function f(x,y) = x^4 + y^4 - 2(x - y)^2, with the constraint f(x,y) ≤ 0. The critical points identified are (0,0), (√2,-√2), and (-√2,√2), with the second derivatives indicating a local maximum at (0,0) since f(0,0) = 0 and f(x,y) is always negative or zero nearby. The Taylor expansion confirms that f(x,y) does not exceed f(0,0), reinforcing the conclusion of a local maximum at (0,0). Additionally, the discussion touches on another function f(x,y) = e^(-x^2 - y^2)(2x^2 - 3y^2), where the local maximum is also questioned, leading to the conclusion that the maximum value is indeed 2e^(-1) at the stationary point (1,0).
aruwin
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
How do I find the extrema using Taylor Series?? I am so used to find extrema just by finding the first derivative (make it =0) and then finding the second derivative and then just use the formula f_xx.f_yy - f_xy and just look at the sign but this time I need to use taylor expansion. I hope you guys can guide me.I have done partial solution but I am not so sure if it's right so help me.

Find the local extrema of the function f(x,y) = x^4 + y^4 - 2(x - y)^2 where f(x,y)≤ 0.

My attempt:
from the partial derivatives,

f_x = 4x^3 - 4(x-y) = 0

f_y = 4y^3 + 4(x-y) = 0

we get (x,y) = (0,0),(√2,-√2),(-√2,√2) (lets name these critical points O,A,B)

Second derivatives,
f_xx= -4, f_xy= 4, f_yy= -4

Expanding the function using taylor series at the origin O = (0,0),
1/2.[fxx(0,0)x2 + 2.fxy(0,0)xy + fyy(0,0)y2 ] = -2(x-y)^2

From the definition:
For all values of (x,y) near (0,0),
f(x,y)≥f(0,0) → At (0,0) f(x,y) has a local minimum
f(x,y)≤f(0,0) → At (0,0) f(x,y) has a local maximum

What I understand is that from the taylor expansion, we know that f(0,0) is always negative (or 0).In other words, f(x,y) is always negative(or 0) at (0,0). Right?And since at the beginnging of the problem, the constraint f(x,y) ≤ 0 is given, it is also negative or 0 but how to know that f(x,y) bigger or than f(0,0)? So let's say there are points
P=(-1,-2) and Q = (1,2). Subtituting these I get -2 and no matter what values I put,they're always going to be negative and that means they're always going to be maximum because it can never go beyond 0,right? I am going to apply what I think and please correct me if I am wrong.

The function at O is -2(x-y)^2.
Substituting values of x and y with 0,
so f(0,0) = 0 and
substituting values of x and y with 1 and 2,
so f(1,2) = -2 and
thus, f(1,2) is lower than f(0,0). Generalizing it, we have f(x,y) lower than or equals to(when we substitute with 0) f(0,0) and so, f(x,y) has a local maximum value of 0 at (0,0).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aruwin said:
How do I find the extrema using Taylor Series?? I am so used to find extrema just by finding the first derivative (make it =0) and then finding the second derivative and then just use the formula f_xx.f_yy - f_xy and just look at the sign but this time I need to use taylor expansion. I hope you guys can guide me.I have done partial solution but I am not so sure if it's right so help me.

Find the local extrema of the function f(x,y) = x^4 + y^4 - 2(x - y)^2 where f(x,y)≤ 0.

My attempt:
from the partial derivatives,

f_x = 4x^3 - 4(x-y) = 0

f_y = 4y^3 + 4(x-y) = 0

we get (x,y) = (0,0),(√2,-√2),(-√2,√2) (lets name these critical points O,A,B)

Second derivatives,
f_xx= -4, f_xy= 4, f_yy= -4

Expanding the function using taylor series at the origin O = (0,0),
1/2.[fxx(0,0)x2 + 2.fxy(0,0)xy + fyy(0,0)y2 ] = -2(x-y)^2

From the definition:
For all values of (x,y) near (0,0),
f(x,y)≥f(0,0) → At (0,0) f(x,y) has a local minimum
f(x,y)≤f(0,0) → At (0,0) f(x,y) has a local maximum

What I understand is that from the taylor expansion, we know that f(0,0) is always negative (or 0).In other words, f(x,y) is always negative(or 0) at (0,0). Right?And since at the beginnging of the problem, the constraint f(x,y) ≤ 0 is given, it is also negative or 0 but how to know that f(x,y) bigger or than f(0,0)? So let's say there are points
P=(-1,-2) and Q = (1,2). Subtituting these I get -2 and no matter what values I put,they're always going to be negative and that means they're always going to be maximum because it can never go beyond 0,right? I am going to apply what I think and please correct me if I am wrong.

The function at O is -2(x-y)^2.
Substituting values of x and y with 0,
so f(0,0) = 0 and
substituting values of x and y with 1 and 2,
so f(1,2) = -2 and
thus, f(1,2) is lower than f(0,0). Generalizing it, we have f(x,y) lower than or equals to(when we substitute with 0) f(0,0) and so, f(x,y) has a local maximum value of 0 at (0,0).

See >>here<< or better >>here<<. Also check which of your stationary points satisfy the constraint.
CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
See >>here<< or better >>here<<. Also check which of your stationary points satisfy the constraint.
CB

Thanks for the links,they are helpful. But I need you to check this for me,please.

Look at this approxiamtion:
f = 2e^(-1), f_x = 0, f_y = 0, f_xx = -8e^(-1), f_xy = 0, f_yy = -10e^(-1)

Hence, f(x, y) = 2e^(-1) + 0(x - 1) + 0y + (1/2!) [-8e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 + 0(x - 1)y - 10e^(-1)y^2] + ...
Since the quadratic term is [-4e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 - 5e^(-1)y^2 (with negative signs and no cross term), we have a local maximum at (1, 0). My question is, what is the maximum value? Is it 2e^(-1)?
 
aruwin said:
Thanks for the links,they are helpful. But I need you to check this for me,please.

Look at this approxiamtion:
f = 2e^(-1), f_x = 0, f_y = 0, f_xx = -8e^(-1), f_xy = 0, f_yy = -10e^(-1)

Hence, f(x, y) = 2e^(-1) + 0(x - 1) + 0y + (1/2!) [-8e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 + 0(x - 1)y - 10e^(-1)y^2] + ...
Since the quadratic term is [-4e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 - 5e^(-1)y^2 (with negative signs and no cross term), we have a local maximum at (1, 0). My question is, what is the maximum value? Is it 2e^(-1)?

Sorry but you now seem to have a different question in mind. Your maximum value is \(f(x_s,y_s)\) where \((x_s,y_s)\) is the stationary point, which we may guess from your post is \((1,0)\) . But as you have not said what \(f(x,y)\) is we can take this no further.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
Sorry but you now seem to have a different question in mind. Your maximum value is \(f(x_s,y_s)\) where \((x_s,y_s)\) is the stationary point, which we may guess from your post is \((1,0)\) . But as you have not said what \(f(x,y)\) is we can take this no further.

CB

Ops, sorry. Yes, this is another question but they're the same thing. I'm going to write the complete question,then.
f(x, y) = e^(-x^2 - y^2) * (2x^2 - 3y^2)

approximtion:
f = 2e^(-1), f_x = 0, f_y = 0, f_xx = -8e^(-1), f_xy = 0, f_yy = -10e^(-1)

Hence, f(x, y) = 2e^(-1) + 0(x - 1) + 0y + (1/2!) [-8e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 + 0(x - 1)y - 10e^(-1)y^2] + ...
Since the quadratic term is [-4e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 - 5e^(-1)y^2 (with negative signs and no cross term), we have a local maximum at (1, 0). Is the max value 2e^(-1)?
 
aruwin said:
Ops, sorry. Yes, this is another question but they're the same thing. I'm going to write the complete question,then.
f(x, y) = e^(-x^2 - y^2) * (2x^2 - 3y^2)

approximtion:
f = 2e^(-1), f_x = 0, f_y = 0, f_xx = -8e^(-1), f_xy = 0, f_yy = -10e^(-1)

Hence, f(x, y) = 2e^(-1) + 0(x - 1) + 0y + (1/2!) [-8e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 + 0(x - 1)y - 10e^(-1)y^2] + ...
Since the quadratic term is [-4e^(-1) (x - 1)^2 - 5e^(-1)y^2 (with negative signs and no cross term), we have a local maximum at (1, 0). Is the max value 2e^(-1)?

What are the stationary points? How did you find them? What I am asking is where are the others?

CB
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K