Finding normal vector to a surface

Click For Summary
To find a normal vector to the parameterized surface C(u,v) = (3 cos u sin v, 2 sin u sin v, cos v), tangent vectors Tu and Tv are calculated using partial derivatives with respect to u and v. The normal vector is obtained by taking the cross product of these tangent vectors. The discussion raises questions about the choice of u and v values for the cross product, noting that using endpoints like (0,0) yields a zero vector, which is not valid. It emphasizes that for curved surfaces, the cross product should not equal zero, while also questioning how to find a normal vector for flat surfaces. Understanding the implications of curvature on the normal vector calculation is crucial.
Kuma
Messages
129
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a parameterized surface:

C(u,v) = (3 cos u sin v, 2 sin u sin v, cos v) 0<u<2pi, 0<v<pi

I have to find a normal vector to that surface.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So tangent vectors can be Tu = (dx/du, dy/du, dz/du) and Tv = (dx/dv, dy/dv, dz/dv)

And I can take the cross of those to find a normal vector. But what points of u and v do i use? The cross product gave me:

(-2sin^2 v cos u, 3sin^2 v sin u, 6sin^2 u sin^2 v - 6 cos^2 u sin^2 v)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what points of u and v do i use?
What difference does it make? (And why?)
 
It shouldn't make a difference. Do i just plug in the endpoints of u and v? ie would (0,0) work? I get (0,0,0) if I use that point. Not a vector...
 
Why shouldn't it make a difference?
What happens if the surface is curved?
 
Right. When the surface is curved the cross product of the tangents shouldn't be 0.
 
You are saying that the cross product of the tangents to a plane (flat) surface are zero?
Then how would you find the normal vector to a plane surface?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K