aadityav
- 3
- 0
- Homework Statement
- A plane pulls out of a downward dive, where the bottom portion of the flight path is a quarter circle with radius 300m. Assume the pilot loses consciousness if the upward acceleration exceeds 6g. Assume g=10m/s^2. What minimum speed must the plane have at the bottom of the dive for the pilot to black out?
- Relevant Equations
- Centripetal Acceleration=v^2/r
When I went to solve it, I set the maximum upwards acceleration equal to the formula for centripetal acceleration (I'm going to call it CA), so we get v^2/r=6g, and then v^2/300=60. Solving for v, we get v=sqrt(18000), or v≈134.16ms. However, my professor said this is wrong, since we must set the centripetal acceleration equal to 7g. He said there is 1g from gravity pointing downwards, so CA−1g=6g and we get CA=7g. When we solve using this value for CA, we get v=sqrt(21000) or v≈144.91ms. So which one is correct, CA=6g (what I did), or CA=7g (what my professor did)?
Further explanation:
My Explanation: I thought it must be CA=6g since the question says the maximum upwards acceleration is 6g, and since centripetal acceleration points in the positive y-direction, we set it equal to 6g. Also, if we were to consider gravity, then my reasoning was that there is always the force of gravity pulling the plane down, but since the plane is flying horizontally (i.e., it's not in a nose dive/free fall), that means there is no upwards or downwards acceleration. And I think this would be because the plane's wings would be generating lift that is the same force as weight, so the sum of vertical forces on the plane is 0, so no vertical acceleration. And then since the pilot would black out at 6g of upwards acceleration, then we set CA=6g since the initial upwards acceleration is 0. I understand that if the plane was already falling down with acceleration g, then we would set CA=7g, but I don't understand why for this.
Professor's Explanation: My professor said that he understands what I mean by how there's no upwards or downwards acceleration due to lift, but he also said that when the plane starts tilting upwards, the acceleration from the lift would now be considered to be centripetal acceleration. So we need 1g of that now called "centripetal acceleration" to stay horizontally moving with no vertical acceleration (which we originally called lift). And since the pilot blacks out with 6g of upwards acceleration, and we already have 1g of upwards acceleration from lift, which we now call centripetal acceleration (although this acceleration upwards doesn't make the plane accelerate vertically, it just counteracts gravity), we set CA=6g+1g=7g, where is 6g term is when the pilot blacks out due to total upwards acceleration and the 1g term doesn't actually count for accelerating the plane upwards, but it is counted as centripetal acceleration even though it is lift.
So which one is correct? Do we actually convert the lift force to centripetal acceleration, or is that false?
Further explanation:
My Explanation: I thought it must be CA=6g since the question says the maximum upwards acceleration is 6g, and since centripetal acceleration points in the positive y-direction, we set it equal to 6g. Also, if we were to consider gravity, then my reasoning was that there is always the force of gravity pulling the plane down, but since the plane is flying horizontally (i.e., it's not in a nose dive/free fall), that means there is no upwards or downwards acceleration. And I think this would be because the plane's wings would be generating lift that is the same force as weight, so the sum of vertical forces on the plane is 0, so no vertical acceleration. And then since the pilot would black out at 6g of upwards acceleration, then we set CA=6g since the initial upwards acceleration is 0. I understand that if the plane was already falling down with acceleration g, then we would set CA=7g, but I don't understand why for this.
Professor's Explanation: My professor said that he understands what I mean by how there's no upwards or downwards acceleration due to lift, but he also said that when the plane starts tilting upwards, the acceleration from the lift would now be considered to be centripetal acceleration. So we need 1g of that now called "centripetal acceleration" to stay horizontally moving with no vertical acceleration (which we originally called lift). And since the pilot blacks out with 6g of upwards acceleration, and we already have 1g of upwards acceleration from lift, which we now call centripetal acceleration (although this acceleration upwards doesn't make the plane accelerate vertically, it just counteracts gravity), we set CA=6g+1g=7g, where is 6g term is when the pilot blacks out due to total upwards acceleration and the 1g term doesn't actually count for accelerating the plane upwards, but it is counted as centripetal acceleration even though it is lift.
So which one is correct? Do we actually convert the lift force to centripetal acceleration, or is that false?