Finding relationships of inner products with operator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of inner products involving operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the notation and calculations related to the operators \(\hat{O_1}\) and \(\hat{O_2}\). Participants are exploring the implications of these operators on functions and their derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the correct notation for inner products involving operators and are questioning the validity of their expressions. There is a focus on using integration by parts and the implications of the product rule in their calculations. Some participants express uncertainty about how to manipulate integrals to determine if the operator \(\hat{O_2}\) is Hermitian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing corrections to each other's calculations and exploring different aspects of the problem. Guidance has been offered regarding the application of Hermitian conjugation to inner products, but there is still uncertainty regarding the evaluation of specific integrals and the properties of the operators.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can provide to one another. There is an emphasis on understanding the underlying concepts rather than simply arriving at a solution.

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2015-3-20_2-57-54.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


a) I am having some trouble understanding the notation. I'm uncertain whether it should be
$$ \langle {f} | \hat {O_{2}} | g \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*}g \frac {dg}{dx} dx $$
or
$$ \langle {f} | \hat {O_{2}} | g \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*}x \frac {dg}{dx} dx $$

b) Once again, the notation is really screwing with my head. I know to start,
$$ [\hat {O_{1}}, \hat {O_{2}}] \psi = (\hat {O_{1}} \hat {O_{2}} - \hat {O_{2}} \hat {O_{1}}) \psi $$
$$ = \hat {O_{1}}(\hat {O_{2}} \psi) - \hat {O_{2}}(\hat {O_{1}} \psi) $$
$$ = \hat {O_{1}}(x \frac {d \psi}{dx}) - \hat {O_{2}}(x^{3} \psi) $$

From here, I am unsure how to do this. My thoughts are either
$$ = x^{3} \Big (x \frac {d \psi}{dx} \Big ) - x \frac {d(x^{3} \psi)}{dx} $$
or
$$ = x^{3} \frac {d^{3} \psi}{dx^{3}} - ? $$
Wouldn't even know what to use for the second term.

I will assume it's the first one since at least I know what to do with that one. Using product rule,
$$ = x^{4} \frac {d \psi}{dx} - x \Big [ x^{3} \frac {d \psi}{dx} + \psi \frac {d (x^{3})}{dx} \Big ] $$
$$ = x^{4} \frac {d \psi}{dx} - x^{4} \frac {d \psi}{dx} - 3x^{3} \psi $$
Therefore, the commutator is ##-3x^{3}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maylis said:
$$ \langle {f} | \hat {O_{2}} | g \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*} x \frac {dg}{dx} dx $$
This one is correct.

Maylis said:
$$ = x^{3} \Big (x \frac {d \psi}{dx} \Big ) - x \frac {d(x^{3} \psi)}{dx} $$
This one is correct.

Maylis said:
Using product rule,
$$ = x^{4} \frac {d \psi}{dx} - x \Big [ x^{3} \frac {d \psi}{dx} + \psi \frac {d (x^{3})}{dx} \Big ] $$
$$ = x^{4} \frac {d \psi}{dx} - x^{4} \frac {d \psi}{dx} - 3x^{3} \psi $$
Therefore, the commutator is ##-3x^{3}##
Correct!

Maybe it would help you seeing ## \hat {O_{2}}## as simply
$$
\hat {O_{2}} = s \frac{d}{dx}
$$
and when you "multiply" from the left with ##d/dx##, it means you take the derivative of the function that is to the right of the operator.
 
Okay then, now I am having some trouble integrating this

Starting from

$$\langle {f} | \hat {O_{2}} | g \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^{*}x \frac {dg}{dx} dx$$
I would probably try to use integration by parts. Choosing ##u = f^{*}x##, ##dv = \frac {dg}{dx} dx##, ##du = \frac {d(f^{*}x)}{dx}##, ##v = g##
$$ uv - \int v \hspace {0.03 in} du $$
$$ = f^{*}xg - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} g(f^{*} + x \frac {df^{*}}{dx}) $$
$$ = f^{*}xg \bigg |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} gf^{*}dx - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g x \frac {df^{*}}{dx} $$
 
Last edited:
Maylis said:
And as you can see, things went terrible wrong as there is no dx in the first integral.
You simply forgot it when calculating ##du##:
##du = \frac {d(f^{*}x)}{dx} dx##
 
Okay, I caught that error. So now I got

$$ = f^{*}xg \bigg |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - gf^{*}x \bigg |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g x \frac {df^{*}}{dx} dx$$
The first two terms cancel, and I am not sure how to evaluate the third term. Also, I am not sure how to manipulate this third integral to show whether or not ##\hat {O_{2}}## is hermitian or not. would it just be
$$ - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x \frac {df^{*}}{dx}g \hspace {0.03 in} dx = - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} (x \frac {df^{*}}{dx})^{*} g \hspace {0.03 in} dx $$

I honestly have no clue how to manipulate to show if it is hermitian or not...for the example of showing if the momentum operator is hermitian or not, I know they just switched the sign of the imaginary part and put a conjugate, then said it was hermitian, but I don't understand it.

I calculate ##\langle g | \hat {O_{2}} | f \rangle## up to the same point and reach
$$ - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x \frac {dg^{*}}{dx}f \hspace {0.03 in} dx $$

I suppose there is something between these two that should determine the relationship between the two and that will answer the question of whether or not the operator is hermitian. How can I show that one is the adjoint of the other?
 
Last edited:
The way to apply hermitian conjugation to a bracket is
$$
\left( \langle f | \hat{O} | g \rangle \right)^\dagger = \langle g | \hat{O}^\dagger | f \rangle
$$
Use that to determine if ##\hat{O}_2## is hermitian.
 
Maylis said:
Okay, I caught that error. So now I got

$$ = f^{*}xg \bigg |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - gf^{*}x \bigg |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g x \frac {df^{*}}{dx} dx$$
I just noticed that that second term there is incorrect.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
696
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K