Finding Req in parallel circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equivalent resistance (Req) in parallel circuits, specifically focusing on two examples involving three resistors each. Participants are exploring the calculations and reasoning behind the addition of fractions in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the derivation of the values used in calculating Req, particularly questioning the source of the numbers 2, 3, and 3 in the fraction addition. Other participants suggest rewriting fractions to a common denominator and provide a breakdown of the calculations involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the calculations, particularly emphasizing the importance of finding a common denominator. There is an indication that the original poster is beginning to grasp the concept, while further questions about a second example remain open for exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework assignments and are encouraged to understand the underlying principles rather than simply obtaining answers. There is a mention of a potential oversight in calculations related to the second example.

Aeden
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi. I am having problems finding the Req in parallel circuits. I have a problem like this


R1- 12
R2- 8
R3- 8
emf- 12
Now I know Req= 1/R1, 1/R2, 1/R3 but my homework book explains that

1/12 1/8 1/8 = (2+3+3)/24 = 8/24 = 1/3 = Req is 3 coulomb


I want to know where the 2+3+3 comes from, I have absolutely no idea how to find that.


I also have another question that says
r1-5
r2-10
r3-15

R1 1/5, R2 1/10, R3 1/15

1/5= .2
1/10= .1
1/15= .066
Req= 0.37

I know this isn't right . I have tried for awhile just by myself to figure this out (I am doing this as a home class) but I cannot do it. Someone please help me out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aeden said:
Hi. I am having problems finding the Req in parallel circuits. I have a problem like this


R1- 12
R2- 8
R3- 8
emf- 12
Now I know Req= 1/R1, 1/R2, 1/R3 but my homework book explains that

1/12 1/8 1/8 = (2+3+3)/24 = 8/24 = 1/3 = Req is 3 coulomb


I want to know where the 2+3+3 comes from, I have absolutely no idea how to find that.

you have R1=12 ohm, R2=8 ohm, R3=8 ohm (I assume that all of them connected in parallel)

so: 1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 = 1/12 + 1/8 + 1/8 (now you have to make the denominator the same so you can add them up, and in this case it would be 24, then you have to multiply and divide the first term (1/12) with 2/2, so you get 2/24, and the second and the third terms (1/8) multiply and divide them with 3/3, so you get 3/24..

then 1/Req = 2/24 + 3/24 + 3/24 = 8/24 = 1/3 >> then Req =3 ohm ..


Regarding your second question, just follow what I did and you should get the right answer.. :)
 
Welcome to PF

Hi Aeden! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Aeden said:
R1- 12
R2- 8
R3- 8
emf- 12
Now I know Req= 1/R1, 1/R2, 1/R3 but my homework book explains that

1/12 1/8 1/8 = (2+3+3)/24 = 8/24 = 1/3 = Req is 3 coulomb


I want to know where the 2+3+3 comes from, I have absolutely no idea how to find that.

When adding fractions with different denominators (the number on the bottom), it helps to rewrite the fractions so that they all have the same denominator.

Here, 1/12 = 2/24; 1/8 = 3/24; so 1/12 + 1/8 + 1/8 = 2/24 + 3/24 + 3/24 = (2 + 3 + 3)/24. :wink:

(the reason why 24 is chosen is that it's the least common multiplier of 8 and 12)
r1-5
r2-10
r3-15

R1 1/5, R2 1/10, R3 1/15

1/5= .2
1/10= .1
1/15= .066
Req= 0.37

erm :redface: … you forgot to 1/ it at the end! :biggrin:

now try it with the same method as the last one (use the least common multiplier of 5 10 and 15), and then …

get some sleep! :zzz:
 
Oh wow, that was really easy to understand. Thanks a lot, I will now try to solve the other with the instructions given but I completely understand how that works now. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
901
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
19K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K