Finding Stress Concentration Factor K for Chamfered Joints

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the stress concentration factor, K, for chamfered joints in rods with varying diameters. The user seeks guidance on calculating K, as existing references like Peterson's and Roark's do not provide solutions for chamfered configurations. It is suggested to model the chamfer as a very small radius in SolidWorks or similar CAD software to conduct stress analysis. The consensus indicates that treating the chamfer as a fillet may be necessary for conservative estimates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress concentration factors (K) in mechanical engineering.
  • Familiarity with SolidWorks or similar CAD software for modeling and stress analysis.
  • Knowledge of fillet and chamfer geometries in structural design.
  • Basic principles of stress analysis in materials under load.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for modeling chamfered joints in SolidWorks for stress analysis.
  • Explore techniques for approximating stress concentration factors for sharp corners.
  • Investigate conservative design practices for stress analysis in mechanical components.
  • Review previous forum discussions, particularly Q_Goest's thread on similar topics.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, CAD designers, and anyone involved in stress analysis and design of structural components with chamfered joints.

patrickv
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a rod of two different diameters and I'm trying to find the stress concentration at the chamfer between the two diameters. I understand how to find the stress concentration factor, K, if the joint was a fillet (using r/d and D/d to find K in the appropriate table). However I can't find any way of getting K for a chamfered joint. Please help point me in some direction. Thanks so much. I've attached a quick diagram showing the filleted and chamfered versions of the shaft. The chamfered one is the actual piece I'm trying to find K for.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
I would make a model in SolidWorks or some other CAD program, and do stress analysis. Should be pretty easy.
 
There is no reference in either Peterson's or Roark's for this. I do remember Q_Goest having the same post a year or so ago. You may want to do a search for that thread. I can not remember what conclusion he came to. I would start by treating it as a very small radius, which in reality is the truth. You will not machine a perfectly sharp corner.
 
Brian_C said:
I would make a model in SolidWorks or some other CAD program, and do stress analysis. Should be pretty easy.

Chamfers are by definition sharp corners. Getting real stress results from a sharp corner numerically is quite a challenge, dare I say impossible. It's hard enough getting real stress numbers in a fillet where you can actually get grid to follow the surface.

You may have to assume a filleted case and take some sort of worst conservative case.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K