Solving a Connection Problem: Bolted Joint Stress Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of stresses in a bolted joint connection involving U beams and an I beam. Participants explore the implications of joint geometry and loading conditions on bolt stresses, focusing on the calculation of moments and forces affecting the bolts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a method for calculating joint stresses in a bolted connection but expresses uncertainty about the effects of the distance between the I beam centroid and the bolt centroid on the moments acting on the bolts.
  • Another participant suggests that without a complete understanding of the system and loading, it is difficult to assess the significance of moments on the bolts, noting that some truss systems may treat joints as pinned with minimal error.
  • A different participant emphasizes the importance of calculating support forces and moments rather than just support stresses, indicating that bolts may experience forces and moments in multiple directions depending on the loading arrangement.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding in terminology, clarifying that they meant to refer to support forces and moments instead of stresses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effects of the joint geometry and loading conditions on bolt stresses. Multiple viewpoints on the analysis approach and the significance of moments remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the system and the need for a complete understanding of loading conditions. There is an indication that the calculations may depend on specific assumptions about the joint behavior and loading scenarios.

Mustard Dijon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi dear friends. I have a big problem and I need your help, I've realized that the joint connection I've drawn (and it is made already) was (most probably) wrong. There is a plate that is bolted to two U beams and the plate is welded to a horizontal I beam at the top. Please take a look at the picture link below. Three of the bolts are for a U beam and three for the other (they are diagonal), top "dot" is the centroid of the welded I beam (there is the same plate at the other side of the I beam, so the system is symmetric wrt the I beam).

I don't have many tools at work, so I manually investigated the joint stresses at the top I beam (can anyone comment on the suitability of this method, what I did is I isolated the top beam in a complicated system because the program I use doesn't give joint stresses, then I found the joint stress and I assume this is the joint stress in the system).

Anyways, my main question is about bolts.To cut it short I'll try to show what I did for bending moment My only and for one of the bolts at the top. I found My as approx. +4500000Nmm. Then I've found the centroid of the bolted joint as (200,100). Now the tensile force due to My on the top bolt should be ((bending moment)*(distance from bolt to the y-axis ))/(sum of all bolt distances to the y-axis squared) which is
((4500000)*(50))/(50^2+0^2+100^2+50^2+100^2+0^2)=9000 N

Then the stress is 9000/144(bolt area)=62.5 mpa due to My.

But I didn't consider (where I did wrong) that the centroid of the I beam (where moments are applied to the plate) is not coincident with the bolt centroid. I don't know how this comes into play. There is a 180 mm distance between the bolt centroid and the I beam centroid. Frankly how does the moment from weld joint affects the bolts I can't really physically understand in my mind. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance.

http://i.imgur.com/SzgtYxy.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is hard to understand the problem without looking at the entire system and loading. You might not even have a moment on the bolts of significance, like if were a truss. Even though the joint is not a true pin, many trusses have large gusset plates at the joints, which may be treated as a pinned joint with small error, and you just get axial forces in the members and the bolts ate designed to resist the shear from the axial loads. The diagonal bolt line of action should line up with the I beam centroid more or less. But I'm only guessing what the system may look like.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mustard Dijon
Yeah it is difficut to describe the problem without pics so I've drawn a representative version of the system. The I beam is welded from the top, the plates with the holes are attached to diagonal beams with bolts. I isolated the I beam from the system and found its support stresses. Then calculated the bolt stresses but I don't know what would be the effect of the distance between the I beam and the bolt centroids. The lines of action points to the I beam centroid.

http://i.imgur.com/CgLnM78.png
 
Last edited:
You want to calculate the support forces and moments, not the support stresses. Depending on what loading arrangement is applied to the system, the bolt pattern could be subject to forces and moments in all directions. Be sure to consider the forces as well as moments acting on the bolts. If there is a moment acting on the bolts, it doesn't matter if it is eccentric to the cg of the bolt pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mustard Dijon
Thank you Sir. It is just my bad wording, I meant support forces and moments. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K