Finding the Ɛ and r of a cell from a graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter shafi25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Graph
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the internal resistance and electromotive force (Ɛ) of a dry cell using both a quick method and a graphical method. The user has successfully calculated Ɛ as 1.490 V and internal resistance (r) as 0.2194 Ω using the quick method, but faces challenges with the graphical method, resulting in a negative resistance value. Clarifications are provided regarding the relationship between the slope of the graph and the internal resistance, emphasizing that a negative resistance is not physically plausible. The user expresses confusion about calculating uncertainties and acknowledges that the emf and r could be derived directly from the graph. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of understanding the equations and methods used in the experiment.
shafi25
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It is an experiment. Finding the internal resistance of a Dry cell. It includes 2 methods, the quick method and the graphical method. Work out and record 8 pairs of V and I reading by varying the slider of the rheostat and then work out the Ɛ (e.m.f) and r (internal resistance) by creating a graph. Then compare these (Ɛ and r) values with the values obtained from the quick method.

Homework Equations


m=∆y/∆x (m=change in y/change in x=(y1-y)/(x1-x))
y=mx+c
V=-Ir+Ɛ

The Attempt at a Solution


I've done the quick method. The obtained values of Ɛ and r from the quick method are Ɛ=1.490 v and r= 0.2194 Ω. And now now I'm stuck here. I have recorded 8 pairs of reading in the result table. And tried to do the graph, but the result is showing some weird figures. I probably am doing it wrong. Also, I'm quite confused with the equation "y=mx+c", I figured this equation is connected with (somehow) V=-rI+Ɛ, but not really sure how to apply them!
Here is the graph I was trying to work out. hope that helps.

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/0d89095d56.jpg

And here is the calculetion:

So, m= ∆y/∆x
m= (y1-y)/(x1-x)
m= (1.197-1.359)/ (0.055-0.025)= (-0.162)/0.030
= -5.4
And the equation of a straight line is y=mx+c
So, 1.359= {(-5.4)*(0.025)} +c [since y=1.359, x=1.197 and m= -5.4]
=>1.359= (-0.135) +c
=>c= 1.359+ 0.135
=>c= 1.494
By rearranging the equation of the straight line,
y= mx+c
V= -Ir+ Ɛ
So, Ɛ= 1.494 v and the internal resistance of the dry cell r= negative 5.4 Ω
Comparing with the quick method, Ɛ=1.490 v and r= 0.2194Ω (Is that even close?, the values from graphical method! )

I've marked RED for those areas that I'm unsure!

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.
Welcome to Physics Forums!

shafi25 said:
. . . here is the calculetion:

So, m= ∆y/∆x
m= (y1-y)/(x1-x)
m= (1.197-1.359)/ (0.055-0.025)= (-0.162)/0.030
= -5.4
Good enough, since the data points all lie very close to a straight line. And you wisely chose the 2 points farthest apart, which minimizes the error in the calculation.

And the equation of a straight line is y=mx+c
So, 1.359= {(-5.4)*(0.025)} +c [since y=1.359, x=1.197 and m= -5.4]
Yes (though you really meant to say x=0.025)
=>1.359= (-0.135) +c
=>c= 1.359+ 0.135
=>c= 1.494
By rearranging the equation of the straight line,
y= mx+c
V= -Ir+ Ɛ
So, Ɛ= 1.494 v and the internal resistance of the dry cell r= negative 5.4 Ω
Correct for Ɛ. However, getting a negative resistance does not make physical sense in this case.
Note the following:
m is the slope in "y=mx+c"
-r is the slope in "V = -Ir + Ɛ​
Equate -r with the value you got for m, and see what you get.
Comparing with the quick method, Ɛ=1.490 v and r= 0.2194Ω (Is that even close?, the values from graphical method! )
I don't know what the quick method is, so I can't really comment on it. What is your opinion about comparing the values for the two methods?
 
Thank you for your reply. yeah, I should have demonstrated the method 1 or as mentioned "quick method". the comparing was actually for the sake of calculating uncertainties, but that's ok. although I am a little confused how to work out uncertainties from a set of values, but I'm working on it. :) and yeah, I found out I could've work out the emf and the r from the graph without even calculating. Thank you.

Shafi
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
405
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K