Finding the Area of a Shaded Region

  • Thread starter Thread starter Youngster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the total area of a shaded region, with a focus on using calculus concepts, particularly the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Participants explore various methods for calculating area, including the use of rectangles and antiderivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of using rectangles to find the area and question whether this is necessary. There is mention of using antiderivatives to calculate the area under the curve, with some participants expressing curiosity about the integration process involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of rectangles and antiderivatives, and there is an acknowledgment of the potential for multiple methods to be explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of examples in the textbook that directly address the problem, which may contribute to uncertainty in their approaches. There is also a mention of the possibility of using double integrals, though it is suggested that this may not be necessary for the current problem.

Youngster
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the total area of the shaded region

yrMcG.png


Homework Equations



The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: [itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{b}_{a}[/itex] f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't seem to have a clue about how to approach this one. Though for previous total area problems, I had to take the absolute value of specific intervals and then add them to obtain the area, or subtract the area under the curve by forming a rectangle using the boundaries given, and subtracting the area of the curve from the area of the rectangle.

Technically I could make a rectangle in this problem, but do I have to? I don't really have any examples in my textbook that point me towards any strategy here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically the area would just be the area of the rectangle because the area under the x-axis has to equal the area from ∏/4 to ∏/2.

I think that would be right?
 
Ah you're right! That bottom portion should fit into the top portion to make a good rectangle :O

Is there some way to calculate that though?
 
Think basic ;)

Area of a rectangle = Base x Height
 
Sorry, haha. I mean, using antiderivatives considering this chapter focuses on using those to calculate areas. I'm aware that it's much simpler to just form a rectangle of [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] base and 4[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] height, and multiply those values to get the area, but I'm curious as to how one obtains it through the use of antiderivatives.
 
Last edited:
Youngster said:
Sorry, haha. I mean, using antiderivatives considering this chapter focuses on using those to calculate areas. I'm aware that it's much simpler to just form a rectangle of [itex]\frac{∏}{2}[/itex] base and 4[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] height, and multiply those values to get the area, but I'm curious as to how one obtains it through the use of antiderivatives.

You would calculate the integral: ##\displaystyle \int_{\pi/4}^{3 \pi/4} 4\sqrt{2} - 4\csc{\theta}\cot{\theta} \ d\theta##

This is because the ##4\sqrt{2}## term calculates the area of the box. By subtracting the second part, you take away from the first part of the box, and then you ADD the second part of the integral of the curve. Normally the area is negative for the part of the curve below the x-axis, but when you subtract it becomes positive.
 
Ah alright! That worked for me.

I was on the right track before, but I went ahead and separated the integral into two parts so that I'd have one integral from [itex]\frac{\pi}{4}[/itex] to [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] and another from [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] to [itex]\frac{3\pi}{4}[/itex]. I see how that works now though.

Thank you for the help!
 
Last edited:
Well, you could solve this using double integral, which i doubt you've covered yet in your syllabus. But i don't think that's what you're being required to do in this problem. You should just solve it as suggested above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K