Finding the Assembly for Two Paths: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter asi123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assembly Path
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving two paths and seeks to determine the correct assembly of these paths, which appears to relate to a complex integration scenario. The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the paths and their representation in the context of integration along the real line and a semicircular contour.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the terminology used by the original poster, suggesting alternatives like "union" or "combination." There is an exploration of the paths' definitions and their representations in complex terms, with some questioning the clarity of the provided diagram. The original poster reflects on the feedback regarding the path representation.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on the terminology and interpretation of the paths. Some have suggested that the problem may involve evaluating an integral using residue theory, indicating a potential direction for the original poster's inquiry. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem, with participants engaging in clarifying the setup and implications of the paths.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific poles in the integrand and their relevance to the closed path, which may influence the evaluation of the integral. The original poster's understanding of the paths and their integration context is still developing, with some assumptions being questioned.

asi123
Messages
254
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hey guys.
I have this two paths as you can see in the picture and I need to find their assembly (I hope I said it correctly).
Which one is correct, the right or the left?

Thanks.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 440
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, "assembly" isn't the correct English. "Union" of the two sets or "combination" of the two paths woud be better.

In any case, the problem, as I interpret this is to integrate some function from -R to R along the real line, then integrate from R to -R along the upper half circle with radius R. On the left, [itex]\gamma1[/itex] seems to be the line y= x or, in terms of complex numbers, t+ it, for t from -R to R. No, that is not at all what is given. But the picture on the right is not clear. You seem to be indicating that [itex]\gamma1[/itex] is raised up to some non-zero y, or in terms of complex numbers, t+ ai for some positive a. That is also not correct. [itex]\gamma1[/itex] is given as t+0i, not t+ some non-zero number times i. You should be showing [itex]\gamma1[/itex] running on the real axis, not above it.
 


HallsofIvy said:
Well, "assembly" isn't the correct English. "Union" of the two sets or "combination" of the two paths woud be better.

In any case, the problem, as I interpret this is to integrate some function from -R to R along the real line, then integrate from R to -R along the upper half circle with radius R. On the left, [itex]\gamma1[/itex] seems to be the line y= x or, in terms of complex numbers, t+ it, for t from -R to R. No, that is not at all what is given. But the picture on the right is not clear. You seem to be indicating that [itex]\gamma1[/itex] is raised up to some non-zero y, or in terms of complex numbers, t+ ai for some positive a. That is also not correct. [itex]\gamma1[/itex] is given as t+0i, not t+ some non-zero number times i. You should be showing [itex]\gamma1[/itex] running on the real axis, not above it.

Got you :smile:
So it actually the half circle over there together with the diameter, this is my path.

Thanks a lot and also thank you for the English correction :smile:
 


Well, the first part of the question ask me to find the integral in red (in the pic).
Is it right what I did?
 

Attachments

  • scan0007.jpg
    scan0007.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 462


What you have is correct but this looks more like a problem where you are expected to evaluate the integral around the closed path by using Residues. The integrand has poles of order 1 at i, -i, 2i, and -2i, of which i and 2i are inside the closed path.
 


HallsofIvy said:
What you have is correct but this looks more like a problem where you are expected to evaluate the integral around the closed path by using Residues. The integrand has poles of order 1 at i, -i, 2i, and -2i, of which i and 2i are inside the closed path.

Oh, yeah, you right, much easier.
And the points that are outside of the closed path equals to 0, right?

Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K