Finding the Coefficients in the Laurent Series of a Logarithm

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the coefficients in the Laurent series for the function f(z) = log((1+z)/(1-z)). The user struggles to match their derived series with Mathematica's output, particularly the coefficient of z^-1, which should include a term of 2/z + iπ. They explore the integration method to derive the series but encounter challenges with branch cuts and closed contour integration. The importance of the chosen branch cut is emphasized, as it affects the consistency of the Laurent series with the function. Ultimately, the user speculates that the iπ term may be an artifact of Mathematica's handling of the argument function in the specified domain.
namu
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am having difficulty matching one term in my Laurent series to that which mathematica tells me is the correct answer. For the function

f(z)=log\frac{1+z}{1-z}

we know that there exists a k such that

Log|1+z|-Log|1-z|+i2\pi k

Now, we know that the Taylor series of f is as below

f(z)=log\frac{1+z}{1-z}=\int \frac{1}{1+z}dz+\int \frac{1}{1-z} dz<br /> =\int \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-z)^n dz+\int \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} dz=2 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^(2n+1)}{2n+1}

Now we would like to find the Laurent series. I used a similar approach resulting in

f(z)=log\frac{1+z}{1-z}=\int \frac{1}{z}\frac{1}{1+1/z}dz-\int \frac{1}{z}\frac{1}{1-1/z} dz =2 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{z^{-(2n+1)}}{2n+1}

Notice that since I used integration to find the coefficients, I was unable to determine the coefficient of the power z^-1 which according to mathematica should give me the following term in the series

\frac{2}{z}+i\pi

I know that we can use the following definition to find this coefficient

b_{-1}=\frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_c f(z) dz

However I do not know how to integrate the closed contour with a branch cut.
Also, it seems that the branch cut we choose is important to make our Laurent
series expansion consistent with the function, however what tells me what the
correct branch cut is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Misunderstood the problem initially so if you saw my first one, it was wrong. Ok, you want the Laurent series for |z|&gt;1. When I go through the algebra by first combining both series then integrating, I get:

-2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{z^{1-2n}}{1-2n}

I'm unclear about the addition of the \pi i term but I believe the general expression can be written as:

f(z)=\pi i+2n\pi i-2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{z^{1-2n}}{1-2n},\quad |z|&gt;1
 
Last edited:
I agree with what you found for |z|>1, however where are you getting the 2nπi eqpression from? That may help me to figure out where I have gone wrong.
 
namu said:
I agree with what you found for |z|>1, however where are you getting the 2nπi eqpression from? That may help me to figure out where I have gone wrong.

If it's just a log(h(z)) where h(z) is single-valued, then the branches differ by 2n\pi i. I probably should not have used n though and written it as:

f(z)=\pi i+2k\pi i-2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{z^{1-2n}}{1-2n},\quad |z|&gt;1

where k is the k'th branch and you know what, I'm starting to think that \pi i thing is just an artifact of Mathematica because the function \displaystyle \frac{1+z}{1-z} for |z|&gt;1 lies entirely in the left half-plane, a linear fractional transformation, so the analytic continuation of the arg function in that range would not agree with Mathematica's "principal" arg function which is -\pi&lt;\theta\leq \pi and therefore to represent the analytic continuation of the function in Mathematica, we need to add the \pi i to adjust the argument so that it is analytically continuous there. Not sure though. Anyone can clarify that for me please?
 
Last edited:
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
840
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K