Finding the current across a resistor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Decan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Resistor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a circuit with multiple resistors and batteries, specifically focusing on finding the current through a 5.3 ohm resistor and a 23.1 ohm resistor. The context is rooted in circuit analysis, particularly Ohm's Law and Kirchhoff's rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Ohm's Law but expresses confusion about the underlying concepts. Some participants suggest using Kirchhoff's rules, while others discuss the implications of current direction and potential differences in the circuit.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different methods for analysis. Some have offered guidance on labeling currents and applying Kirchhoff's rules, while others are clarifying the relationship between voltage and current in parallel branches. There is a mix of understanding and uncertainty, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be constrained by the lack of prior discussion on Kirchhoff's rules in class, and there are questions about the assumptions regarding battery contributions and potential differences across the circuit elements.

Decan
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The currents are flowing in the direction indicated by the arrows. A negative current denotes flow opposite to the direction of the arrow. Asume the batteries have zero internal resistance. Find (part 1)the current through the 5.3 ohm resistor and the 3.1 V battery at the top of the circuit and (part 2) the current through the 23.1 ohm resistor in the center of the circuit.

Here is the circuit in question: http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/6863/physicseg7.th.png

Homework Equations


V = IR


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved the problem but to be honest I plugged in numbers until I got the right answer. I do not understand the concept (but I would like to!) behind the problem and would really like some help decoding the problem. Here was my thought process...

Part 1 - the overall voltage in the circuit is the sum of 3.1 V and 18.6 V. The current is flowing through from the positive termial of the 18.6 V battery, splits at the junction, and flows across the 5.3 ohm resistor. Since the battery has no internal resistance, current will be reduced across the 5.3 ohm resistor but would not be affected as it goes through the battery. Similarly, the current moves from the second battery, across the 23.1 ohm resistor and across the 5.3 ohm resistor. So, I = (18.6 V + 3.1 V)/5.3 ohm = 4.09 A

Part 2 - The current flows from the 18.6 V battery, across the 23.1 ohm resistor. I = 18.6 V/23.1ohm = -.805 A

I'm probably completely wrong here...but I'd really like to learn the concept behind the problem. If anyone could please explain to me where my thought process is flawed, and help me derive/understand what's going on in the diagram, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Problems like these are usually solved with Kirchoff's rules.
 
Thats what I figured...but we haven't discussed them in class so I don't really know what they are. My professor assured us in class that the problem can be solved with ohms law...but since I couldn't figure out a way to apply the ohms law, I read the book and I think I understand the kirchhoffs rules, but do not know how to apply them. Junction rule states that the sum of the currents going out of a junction must equal the current going into a junction (charge is conserved) whereas the loop rule basically sates that the energy is conserved in a loop (sum of all potential differences is 0). How can I apply them here?
 
For the currents you would say that

I_5 = I_{18} + I_{23}

For the potentials you would "add them up" in any closed loop in the circuit (your circuit has three closed loops). For instance the top loop would give

- 23.1 * I_{23} - 5.3 * I_5 + 3.1 = 0
 
Last edited:
I see...I guess where I'm lost is trying to figure out which way the charge is going to flow.
 
First of all, you should subscript the currents in the different parts of the circuit, so that you can keep track of the different values. Second, current flows through a circuit element in response to the voltage that is connected across it.

So label the currents with subscripts and write an equation for each leg --- what do you get?
 
You are free to choose the direction of the current as you see fit. After solving for the currents you will then get either positive or negative amperes for their values. The current will flow in the opposite direction you chose it in if its value comes out negative.
 
@ berkeman, So here's the updated drawing...

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/6823/physicsmq4.th.png

If I solve for current in each branch, I get:

I_ab = V_ab/R (but since the battery does not have any internal resistance, what would this current be?)

I_cd = V_cd/R

I_fe = V_fe/R

I guess I can find the overall current in the circuit by adding up the voltage from the two batteries and the resistance from the parallel ciruits to get: I_total = V_total/R_parallel...is this useful?

@andrevdh, that makes sense! I recall reading that in the book but it didnt click until you mentioned it.

Now that I have an expression for currents going through each branch, how do I determine the appropriate voltage and resistance for each branch?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My approach (not using Kirchoff's rules) would be to notice that we have three parallel branches. The voltage over all three need to be the same, that is 18.6 V. This enables you to calculate I_cd. For the ef leg notice that the 3.1 V opposes the 18.6 V. This means that the drop over the 5.3 ohm resistor need to be 18.6 + 3.1 volt , which gives you I_fe.
 
  • #10
I think the prof is right, no need to resort to Kirchoffs law since there is no resistor on the lower branch of the circuit.

the voltages across all three parallel branches must be the same and equal to the voltage of the bottom battery=18.6

For the middle branch that's simply IR,

For the top, its IR-3.6=18.6
 
  • #11
I think I understand! I get that the voltage is conserved...but why is the voltage 18.6 across all branches? Why doesn't the top battery contribute to the overall charge?
 
  • #12
Well they don't really but will seek to become so, in other words if you had switches involved and could instantly tie all the limbs together, they would not be at the same potential, the middle would be at zero, while the top would be at -3.6 V. The fact that there is a potential difference will cause current to flow until they are at the same potential. Convinced yet? The "bigger" reason has to do with forces on charged particles in an electric field.
In this case the battery on the bototm is tied to the nodes with no intervening resistors so those nodes are the same potential as the battery itself. A resistor would change everything as the potential drop across it would would be unknown and would be more complicated problem.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Wires do not have resistance so there are no potential drop over them. This means that the three legs need to be at the same potential, which from the circuit is obvious that it needs to be 18.6 V due to the cell at the bottom. In the top leg the additional cell creates an additional potential in that leg thereby creating more potential over the resistor. The larger cell at the bottom will control the current flow in the top leg since its potential is larger, so your choice of current direction is correct. We can see that the cell in the top is assisting the current flow, thereby causing a larger potential over the resistor in that leg.
 
  • #14
I get it...thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K