Finding the Current in a Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snoop06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Current
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the current in a circuit with a specified voltage source. Participants are tasked with applying Kirchhoff's laws and Ohm's law to derive equations for the currents in different branches of the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss labeling junctions and applying Kirchhoff's current and voltage laws to set up equations. There is an exploration of different loop equations and the relationships between the currents. Some participants express confusion over the setup of the equations and the interpretation of the circuit diagram.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their equations and attempting to clarify their approaches. Some have provided partial answers for the currents, while others are still working through the algebra and seeking alternative methods for solving the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention time constraints and the need to submit their work soon. There is also a reference to the possibility of using calculators for matrix solutions, indicating a level of complexity in the algebra involved.

Snoop06
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the magnitude of the current in each branch of the circuit shown below, in which B1 = 3.86 V. Specify the direction of each current. (See attached image)

Homework Equations



V=IR
Kirchhoff's rule

The Attempt at a Solution



I labeled the points in the circuit starting in the lower left hand corner with A, then going up to the first junction B, and so on. Hopefully that makes my explanation make more sense.

I went ahead and chose E as my junction point (the junction point on the right) to give me the equation:

I2-I1-I3=0 or I1=I2-I3 (1)

Then I looked and the bottom loop, starting in the lower left hand corner going up. I got:

-I2R2-I3R3+E1=0 (2)

I next looked at the loop starting at point B and going up. I got:

-E2+I1R1+I2R2=0 (3)

I substituted equation 1 into equation 3 (giving me equation 4). I then multiplied both sides of equation 4 by 75 and both sides of equation 3 by 22 in order to get matching coefficients on the I3 term. I then subtracted those two equations to eliminate I3, giving me:

4618I2=459.92

I2=99.59mA which was incorrect.

I spent a lot of time on this and can't figure out where I went wrong, ant help is appreciated, and I will clarify anything that doesn't make sense. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • diagram.jpg
    diagram.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 534
Physics news on Phys.org
Any tips?

It's due in an hour and I still can't figure out where I've gone wrong :(

I've done it a few times from the beginning and still have gotten the same answer...
 
You should get three equations for the three unknowns. It looks like you have two, though the loop descriptions are ambiguous (going up?). There are three loops you can go around, all of which you know from Kirchoff's Voltage law must sum to zero. I'll give you two of them. Let me name the currents I1, I2, and I3 from bottom to top, and have them all go right (the signs will work themselves out later), from KVL I get:

Loop one is going around the bottom half of the circuit starting at the battery:
-EB+56I1+76I2=0

Loop two is going around the top half of the circuit starting at the 56Ω resistor:
-56I2+5V+22I3=0

Can you do the third one? Are you familiar with linear algebra (some high school algebra classes cover it)?
 
Mindscrape said:
You should get three equations for the three unknowns. It looks like you have two, though the loop descriptions are ambiguous (going up?). There are three loops you can go around, all of which you know from Kirchoff's Voltage law must sum to zero. I'll give you two of them. Let me name the currents I1, I2, and I3 from bottom to top, and have them all go right (the signs will work themselves out later), from KVL I get:

Loop one is going around the bottom half of the circuit starting at the battery:
-EB+56I1+76I2=0

Loop two is going around the top half of the circuit starting at the 56Ω resistor:
-56I2+5V+22I3=0

Can you do the third one? Are you familiar with linear algebra (some high school algebra classes cover it)?

I was trying to use Kirchhoffs current rule for my first equation, where at the junction point on the right in the middle I2-I1-I3=0. But I see where I could use the third loop. Is -EB+75I1-22I3+5=0 correct?

I am kind of confused where you wrote -EB+56I1+75I2, doesn't the 75 ohm resistor correspond to I1?

Thanks for the help so far.
 
Oh, whoops I accidentally switched the resistors. It should be

-Eb+56I2+75I1

Yes your equation is correct. Now you just have to go through the algebra, which you can do with substitution at this point, but it may take awhile.

I'll give you one of the answers in a sec that may help you, though you really ought to learn about procrastination. :p
 
Okay, you should get 62mA for the top current, but if I made a mistake you are in trouble as you only have 15 mins.
 
The bottom ought to be 3mA and the mid ought to be 65mA.
 
Last edited:
Mindscrape said:
I'll give you one of the answers in a sec that may help you, though you really ought to learn about procrastination. :p

I've been learning about that since high school :redface: lol.

Thank you for the help, did you get the other two values by plugging the value you got for the middle current into the previous equations?

Also, you said that substitution may take a while...do you have another technique for solving the three linear equations? This whole process with currents and circuits really takes me a while to do so anything to speed me up a little will definitely help on exams and such..

Thank you again for the help.
 
I actually used a technique called mesh current analysis which went a little faster. But yeah, the idea is that once you get one of the answers you can just put it into the other answers. A quick way to solve systems of equations is with linear algebra techniques, Gauss Elimination probably being the best. To learn them requires a couple pages of writing I'd rather not do, but you could probably look it up.
 
  • #10
Gaussian Elimination is a good one. You can also use Kramer's rule, or if you have a calculator that can do matrix, that would be the easiest method.
 
  • #11
What website is this on
 
  • #12
Mindscrape said:
I actually used a technique called mesh current analysis which went a little faster. But yeah, the idea is that once you get one of the answers you can just put it into the other answers. A quick way to solve systems of equations is with linear algebra techniques, Gauss Elimination probably being the best. To learn them requires a couple pages of writing I'd rather not do, but you could probably look it up.

PowerIso said:
Gaussian Elimination is a good one. You can also use Kramer's rule, or if you have a calculator that can do matrix, that would be the easiest method.

Thanks, I'll look that up. And you I do have a calculator so maybe I'll try to figure out the matrices, though I haven't dealt with them for a while...

Also, my teacher decided to extend it a couple days so apparently I wasn't the only one procrastinating :biggrin:

glennpagano44 said:
What website is this on

The original question? It's on webassign.
 
  • #13
PowerIso said:
Gaussian Elimination is a good one. You can also use Kramer's rule, or if you have a calculator that can do matrix, that would be the easiest method.

I think you mean Cramer's Rule. :wink:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule

CS
 
  • #14
What's the deal with Cramer? /Seinfeld voice

Do the kids these days know about Seinfeld?

Anyway, a site about mesh current:
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/3.html

You should also learn about node voltage if you have a couple more weeks of circuits:
http://www.calvin.edu/~svleest/circuitExamples/NodeVoltageMeshCurrent/

A site that shows Guassian Elimination (my favorite) though Cramer's rule is probably better for straight numerics:
http://www.personal.psu.edu/jhm/f90/lectures/lu.html

Linear algebra is about solving two things Ax=b and Av=Ev, and Gauss elimination gives you the big tool to solve the first guy.
 
  • #15
Mindscrape said:
The bottom ought to be 3mA and the mid ought to be 65mA.

I actually have the same question I'm working on and went through the steps to solve this problem. I got the top branch right and the bottom keeps turning up to be wrong. Was 3 right for you?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K