Finding Density: Method to Tell Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter semidevil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on differentiating methods for finding densities in two scenarios involving random variables X and Y. In the first problem, the marginal density of Y is derived from the joint density by integrating over the defined area, while in the second problem, the conditional distribution of Y given X requires a different approach that combines the densities rather than integrating. The key distinction lies in whether the variables are independent or if one is conditioned on the other, which influences the method used. Understanding the relationship between X and Y is crucial for selecting the appropriate technique. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing these relationships to determine the correct method for density calculation.
semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
These are 2 problems that I can solve, but I don't know how to tell the difference between these 2 when it comes to finding the densities. I just need to know how to tell whichmethod to use to find the density. I do not need the solution.

Homework Statement



A)
Suppose that (X; Y ) is uniformly chosen from the set given by 0 < X < 3 and x < y < root(3x). Find the marginal density fy (y) of Y.

B)
If X is uniformly distributed on [0, 2], and given that X = x, Y is uniformly distributed on [x 2x], what is P[Y <2]?

2. The attempt at a solution
For A), to find the joint density, I integrate 1 dy dx of the shape to get the area. the joint density is then 1/area. This makes sense to me.
For B), integrating 1 dydx doesn't seem to work and instead, it is just simply combining f(x) and f(y). 1/2 * 1/x to get the density.

I understand the uniform shortcuts so I know where 1/2 and 1/x came from, but how do I know when to use which method? I,e. how do I know that I need to integrate 1, rather then just multiply f(x)*f(y).
both tell us that x, y are uniformly distributed; I understand that the difference is that one involves a conditional distribution, so is that the determining factor?3. Relevant equations
if f(x) is uniform on (a,b), the area is b-a. the density would then be 1/(b-a).
f(x)*f(y) = f(x,y) if independent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semidevil said:
These are 2 problems that I can solve, but I don't know how to tell the difference between these 2 when it comes to finding the densities. I just need to know how to tell whichmethod to use to find the density. I do not need the solution.

Homework Statement



A)
Suppose that (X; Y ) is uniformly chosen from the set given by 0 < X < 3 and x < y < root(3x). Find the marginal density fy (y) of Y.

B)
If X is uniformly distributed on [0, 2], and given that X = x, Y is uniformly distributed on [x 2x], what is P[Y <2]?

2. The attempt at a solution
For A), to find the joint density, I integrate 1 dy dx of the shape to get the area. the joint density is then 1/area. This makes sense to me.
For B), integrating 1 dydx doesn't seem to work and instead, it is just simply combining f(x) and f(y). 1/2 * 1/x to get the density.

I understand the uniform shortcuts so I know where 1/2 and 1/x came from, but how do I know when to use which method? I,e. how do I know that I need to integrate 1, rather then just multiply f(x)*f(y).
both tell us that x, y are uniformly distributed; I understand that the difference is that one involves a conditional distribution, so is that the determining factor?


3. Relevant equations
if f(x) is uniform on (a,b), the area is b-a. the density would then be 1/(b-a).
f(x)*f(y) = f(x,y) if independent.

Neither of your X and Y are independent, so that last equation is useless.

Think of what density really means:
P(x &lt; X &lt; x + \Delta x, y &lt; Y &lt; y + \Delta y) \doteq f(x,y) \Delta x \, \Delta y
(neglecting smaller-order terms like ##(\Delta x)^2,## etc).
This implies
P(y &lt; Y &lt; y+\Delta y | X=x) <br /> \equiv \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} P(y &lt; Y &lt; y+\Delta y|x &lt; X &lt; x + \Delta x),
and this last conditional probability is
P(y &lt; Y &lt; y+\Delta y|x &lt; X &lt; x + \Delta x) = <br /> \frac{P(x &lt; X &lt; x + \Delta x, y &lt; Y &lt; y + \Delta y)}{P(x &lt;X &lt; x + \Delta x)}
In other words, for small ##\Delta x, \, \Delta y## we have
P(x &lt; X &lt; x + \Delta x, y &lt; Y &lt; y + \Delta y) \doteq<br /> P(y &lt; Y &lt; y+\Delta y | X=x) \cdot P(x &lt;X &lt; x + \Delta x)
You can take it from here.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K