Finding the distance of a peg so that a pendulum can circle around it

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance of a peg for a pendulum to complete a circular motion. The user derived equations for tension and velocity but faced criticism for using the velocity at the lowest point instead of the top of the trajectory. The importance of considering potential energy at the highest point of the pendulum's swing was highlighted. Additionally, the need for clearer notation and the use of symbols instead of numbers was emphasized for better readability. The user acknowledged the oversight and expressed a desire to improve their presentation of equations in future posts.
SelzerRS
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A pendulum made of a string and a sphere is able to swing in a vertical plane. The pendulum is released from a position of 55 ◦ from vertical. The string hits a peg located a distance d below the point of suspension and rotates about the peg. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2. Find the smallest value of d (highest peg position) in order for the sphere to swing in a full circle centered on the peg. Answer in units of m.
Relevant Equations
Ki+Ui=Kf+Uf
U=mgh
K=1/2(m*v^2)
Fc=(m*v^2)/r
Last time I posted to the forums I was told to use some type of text thing to make equations easier to read for clarity, but I can't figure it out, so sorry if this is hard to read.
Screenshot 2024-09-26 184731.png
Screenshot 2024-09-26 184743.png


I know that d = 10-r
After making a free-body diagram, I thought the circular force had to equal Tension + weight, so I set Fc = mg+T and solved for r
r =( m*v^2)/(mg+T)
I first used conservation of energy to find the velocity of the sphere:
I set when the sphere is the lowest at 0 m height and the suspension at 10 m height. B/c initial v=0, Ki=0 and b/c final height=0, Uf=0, so
Kf = Ui or (m*v^2)/2 = mgh so velocity must be v=sqrt(2gh)
I found the initial height of the sphere using the length of the pendulum and trig to find the height above it then subtract by 10.
h=10-(cos(55)*10)=4.264235 m
I plugged my numbers in and got
v=sqrt(2*9.8*4.264235)= 9.142156 m/s
Next I found Tension by drawing a free-body diagram and seeing it was in the opp direction of (mg)/cos(55).
I assumed that the two cancel each other so
(mg)/cos(55)=T
Plugged in the numbers and got
T = 71.7603 N
After finding T and v, I plugged my values back into the equation for r
r = (4.2*9.142156^2)/((4.2*9.8)+71.7603) = 3.10867 m
Then subtracted by 10 to get
d = 6.89133 m

Here's my scratchwork, I know it's messy but hopefully it better explains my thought process.
KvaD9q28VH7WvFAzqoURfXu?key=U8oY-076miEs-tegyKJAGg.jpg

I think I might have gone wrong when finding tension, but it may also be my whole set up. Please let me know
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-09-26 184731.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-26 184731.png
    26.3 KB · Views: 47
  • Screenshot 2024-09-26 184743.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-26 184743.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 65
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that the tension at the moment of release at angle 55° when the speed is zero is the same as the tension when the mass is at the top of the trajectory. That is incorrect. The tension depends on both the speed and the angle.

Your equation ##m\dfrac{v^2}{r}=mg +T## was derived from the FBD at the top of the trajectory. Yet, you substitute 9.142156 (units?) for v which is the speed at the lowest point of the motion. That is plain wrong.

The problem is asking you to find the smallest of ##d## so that the mass describes a full circle. You need to think what that means. What would happen to the trajectory of the mass if the value of ##d## were smaller than that value? What would happen to the trajectory of the mass if the value of ##d## were larger than that value?

Also, please use symbols instead of numbers and substitute at the very end. Then you will not have to carry the variables to an absurd number of significant figures. It is very difficult to follow what you are doing from strings of numbers without units.
 
  • Like
Likes SelzerRS and erobz
Thank you! I realized I forgot to take into account the potential energy of the sphere at the highest trajectory. I'm working on learning how to use LaTex so that my work is easier to read next time👍
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top