Finding the distance of a peg so that a pendulum can circle around it

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance of a peg for a pendulum to complete a circular motion. The user derived equations for tension and velocity but faced criticism for using the velocity at the lowest point instead of the top of the trajectory. The importance of considering potential energy at the highest point of the pendulum's swing was highlighted. Additionally, the need for clearer notation and the use of symbols instead of numbers was emphasized for better readability. The user acknowledged the oversight and expressed a desire to improve their presentation of equations in future posts.
SelzerRS
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A pendulum made of a string and a sphere is able to swing in a vertical plane. The pendulum is released from a position of 55 ◦ from vertical. The string hits a peg located a distance d below the point of suspension and rotates about the peg. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2. Find the smallest value of d (highest peg position) in order for the sphere to swing in a full circle centered on the peg. Answer in units of m.
Relevant Equations
Ki+Ui=Kf+Uf
U=mgh
K=1/2(m*v^2)
Fc=(m*v^2)/r
Last time I posted to the forums I was told to use some type of text thing to make equations easier to read for clarity, but I can't figure it out, so sorry if this is hard to read.
Screenshot 2024-09-26 184731.png
Screenshot 2024-09-26 184743.png


I know that d = 10-r
After making a free-body diagram, I thought the circular force had to equal Tension + weight, so I set Fc = mg+T and solved for r
r =( m*v^2)/(mg+T)
I first used conservation of energy to find the velocity of the sphere:
I set when the sphere is the lowest at 0 m height and the suspension at 10 m height. B/c initial v=0, Ki=0 and b/c final height=0, Uf=0, so
Kf = Ui or (m*v^2)/2 = mgh so velocity must be v=sqrt(2gh)
I found the initial height of the sphere using the length of the pendulum and trig to find the height above it then subtract by 10.
h=10-(cos(55)*10)=4.264235 m
I plugged my numbers in and got
v=sqrt(2*9.8*4.264235)= 9.142156 m/s
Next I found Tension by drawing a free-body diagram and seeing it was in the opp direction of (mg)/cos(55).
I assumed that the two cancel each other so
(mg)/cos(55)=T
Plugged in the numbers and got
T = 71.7603 N
After finding T and v, I plugged my values back into the equation for r
r = (4.2*9.142156^2)/((4.2*9.8)+71.7603) = 3.10867 m
Then subtracted by 10 to get
d = 6.89133 m

Here's my scratchwork, I know it's messy but hopefully it better explains my thought process.
KvaD9q28VH7WvFAzqoURfXu?key=U8oY-076miEs-tegyKJAGg.jpg

I think I might have gone wrong when finding tension, but it may also be my whole set up. Please let me know
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-09-26 184731.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-26 184731.png
    26.3 KB · Views: 49
  • Screenshot 2024-09-26 184743.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-26 184743.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 67
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming that the tension at the moment of release at angle 55° when the speed is zero is the same as the tension when the mass is at the top of the trajectory. That is incorrect. The tension depends on both the speed and the angle.

Your equation ##m\dfrac{v^2}{r}=mg +T## was derived from the FBD at the top of the trajectory. Yet, you substitute 9.142156 (units?) for v which is the speed at the lowest point of the motion. That is plain wrong.

The problem is asking you to find the smallest of ##d## so that the mass describes a full circle. You need to think what that means. What would happen to the trajectory of the mass if the value of ##d## were smaller than that value? What would happen to the trajectory of the mass if the value of ##d## were larger than that value?

Also, please use symbols instead of numbers and substitute at the very end. Then you will not have to carry the variables to an absurd number of significant figures. It is very difficult to follow what you are doing from strings of numbers without units.
 
  • Like
Likes SelzerRS and erobz
Thank you! I realized I forgot to take into account the potential energy of the sphere at the highest trajectory. I'm working on learning how to use LaTex so that my work is easier to read next time👍
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top