Finding the energy field due to three positive point charges on a 4th negative charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field and force on a negative charge placed at one corner of a square formed by three positive point charges. The charges are specified with magnitudes and positions, and the task is to determine the electric field at the location of the negative charge and the resulting force acting on it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for the electric field due to the positive charges and the force on the negative charge. There are attempts to clarify the correct values for the distances and charges involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on recalculating the distance and electric field values. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations, with some participants questioning the accuracy of previous attempts and suggesting corrections. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to verify the calculations without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of significant figures in calculations and the need to ensure that all values used in the equations are correct. There is also mention of constraints related to the homework rules, such as the number of attempts allowed.

MarieWynn
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three equal positive point charge of magnitude Q=7.00uC are located at three corners of a square of edge length d=4.8cm. A negative charge of -21.00uC is placed on the fourth corner.
A) At the position of the negative charge, what is the magnitude of the electric field due to the three positive charges?
B) What is the magnitude of the attractive force on the negative charge?


Homework Equations


Ea=kQ/d^2 (also applies to Ec)
Eb=sqrt (Ea^2 + Ec^2)
e=KQ/r^2
r=sqrt(2d)


The Attempt at a Solution


I haven't gotten to part B yet, but here is the work I have done for part A.
Ea=(8.99x10^9)(7x10^-6)/.048^2=2.7x10^7
Ec=2.7x10^7
Eb=sqrt(Ea^2+Ec^2)=3.86x10^7
The electric field at the negative point due to the corner charge: e=KQ/r^2
e=(8.99x10^9)(21x10^-6)/0.3098^2=1967053.444
Since e and Eb are parallel, to find the magnitude of the electric field you would need to add them together: e+Eb=4.1x10^7

I have no idea why this is wrong. I also tried breaking it down into vectors, but that also got a wrong answer as well. If that was the right line of thinking I can post the work for that, but it felt off to me. I am including the diagram I drew up a well. I only have one try left so any guidance to help me see what I am doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.

Untitled-1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Marie! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
MarieWynn said:
e=(8.99x10^9)(21x10^-6)/0.3098^2=1967053.444

No, read the question again, the charge is still 7 :redface:

(and where does 0.3098 come from?)
 


Heh, I see the x2 button now. :) Thanks!

0.3098 is r, where r=sqrt(2d).

I had originally kept the charge the same for that part where e=(8.99x109)(7x10-6)/r2 but the answer was still wrong. It gave me 6.6x105 and when adding that to Eb, I got 3.9x107 N/C, which is still incorrect.
 
MarieWynn said:
0.3098 is r, where r=sqrt(2d)

nooooooooooo! :cry:

r=sqrt(2)d (or, easier, r2 = 2d2)​

start again, and post it here first so we can check it! :smile:

then get some sleep! :zzz:​
 


So r2=2d2=2*0.0482=0.004608
e=KQ/r2=(8.99x109)*(7x10-6)/0.004608=1.4x107

Then adding that to Eb would give us: E= 5.2x107 N/C
Is that right? Which would bring us to part B, which would be:
F=Eq=(5.2x107)(21x10-6)= 1092 N
 
MarieWynn said:
So r2=2d2=2*0.0482=0.004608
e=KQ/r2=(8.99x109)*(7x10-6)/0.004608=1.4x107

Then adding that to Eb would give us: E= 5.2x107 N/C
Is that right? Which would bring us to part B, which would be:
F=Eq=(5.2x107)(21x10-6)= 1092 N

Yes, that all looks ok :smile:, except you should have at least three https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=523" in all your intermediate steps, or you might have a rounding error …

you always need more sig figs in the intermediate steps than in the final result

(and the Newtons should presumably be to only 2 sig figs)

do it again to check :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Thank you so much! This was correct and you really helped me to understand what I did wrong. When I get this problem right on the test I will thank you again! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K