Finding the final speed of a space probe using work and kinetic energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the final speed of a space probe using work and kinetic energy principles. The initial work calculated was 9.43x10^13 J, and the initial kinetic energy was 0.34x10^13 J. Participants identified discrepancies in the calculations, particularly regarding the final speed, which was incorrectly stated as 1.38x10^4 m/s. The consensus is that either the provided quantities contain typos or the "correct answer" is erroneous, as the expected final speed should be significantly higher based on the work done.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of work-energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of unit conversions and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the work-energy theorem and its applications in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between work done and changes in kinetic energy
  • Study how to properly handle units and exponents in calculations
  • Explore common pitfalls in physics problem-solving, particularly in energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching work and energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of space probes and their calculations.

aqryus
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A deep space probe of mass 4.55 x10^4kg is travelling at an initial speed of 1.22 x10^4
m/s. The engines of the probe exert a force of magnitude 3.85 x10^5
N over 2.45 x10^8 m. Determine the probes final speed
Relevant Equations
W=Ek2-Ek1
W=fd
W=(1/2)mv2^2-(1/2)mv1^2
First I found work:

W=(3.85x10^5)(2.45x10^8)
W= 9.43x10^13

Then used that for difference of kinetic energy:

9.43x10^13 = (1/2) (4.55x10^4)v2^2 - (1/2)(4.55x10^4)(1.22x10^4)^2
9.43x10^13 = (22750)v2^2 - 3.386x10^12
9.43x10^13 + 3.386x10^12 = (22750)v2^2
9.77x10^13 = 22750v2^2
9.77x10^13/22750 = v^2
squareroot 4.3x10^6 = v
6.55x10^4 = v

But the answer is 1.38x10^4 m/s? I'm not sure where I went wrong. Any help is appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are the exponents for the distance and force correct?
 
Frabjous said:
Is the exponent for the distance or force correct?
definitely an 8 on the worksheet
 
If the work is a factor of 100 smaller, you get their answer. Check the units also. Also check the force.
 
aqryus said:
squareroot 4.3x10^6 = v
6.55x10^4 = v
I don't know about the calculations that brought you to the two last equations but the very last equation does not follow from the next to last equation. The square root of 4.3 is a bit more than 2 and the square root of 10^6 is 10^3. So the answer that follows should have been a bit more more than 2000. You need to redo the calculations.
 
kuruman said:
I don't know about the calculations that brought you to the two last equations but the very last equation does not follow from the next to last equation. The square root of 4.3 is a bit more than 2 and the square root of 10^6 is 10^3. So the answer that follows should have been a bit more more than 2000. You need to redo the calculations.
The 106 is a typo. Should be 109.
 
Something is not adding up here.

The 9.4x1013 J of work is roughly 30 times greater than the initial kinetic energy of 0.34x1013 J. So, we'd expect the final speed to be a factor of roughly sqrt(30) times the initial speed, as the OP got.

However, the quoted "correct answer" is only about 13% greater than the initial speed (1.38/1.22=1.13). Even if the probe started from rest, doing that much work would give a much greater final speed.

Either there's a typo in the given quantities, or whoever is providing the "correct answer" made an error.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu
Redbelly98 said:
Something is not adding up here.

The 9.4x1013 J of work is roughly 30 times greater than the initial kinetic energy of 0.34x1013 J. So, we'd expect the final speed to be a factor of roughly sqrt(30) times the initial speed, as the OP got.

However, the quoted "correct answer" is only about 13% greater than the initial speed (1.38/1.22=1.13). Even if the probe started from rest, doing that much work would give a much greater final speed.

Either there's a typo in the given quantities, or whoever is providing the "correct answer" made an error.
As noted by @Frabjous in post #4, taking either the thrust or the distance over which it is applied down two orders of magnitude gives the book answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K