Finding the Hamiltonian of this system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Hamiltonian for a system defined by a specific Lagrangian. The original poster presents their attempts at deriving the Hamiltonian and expresses uncertainty regarding the method used, particularly the Legendre transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the Hamiltonian from the given Lagrangian and questions the correctness of their method. Some participants suggest considering additional generalized coordinates and momenta. Others raise concerns about the conservation of the Hamiltonian in the context of the system's dynamics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's attempts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the consideration of additional variables, and there is an ongoing exploration of the implications of time-dependent transformations on energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to a previous thread that provides background information on the Lagrangian, indicating that some context may be missing for a complete understanding of the problem. The original poster also notes that they have not been taught the Legendre transformation, which adds to their uncertainty.

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am asked to find the Hamiltonian of a system with the following Lagrangian:

##L=\frac{m}{2}[l^2\dot\theta^2+\dot{\tilde{y}}^2+2l\dot{\tilde{y}}\dot{\theta}\sin{\theta}]-mg[\tilde{y}-l\cos{\theta}]##

Homework Equations



##H = \dot{q_i}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}}-L=\dot{\theta}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}-L##

##p_i=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}}\implies p_{\theta}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}##

The Attempt at a Solution



##H = \dot{\theta}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}-L\\
~~~=\dot{\theta}[ml^2\dot{\theta}^2+ml\dot{\tilde{y}}\sin{\theta}]-L\\
~~~=\frac{m}{2}[2l^2\dot{\theta}^2+2ml\dot{\tilde{y}}\dot{\theta}\sin{\theta}]-L\\
~~~=\frac{m}{2}[l^2\dot{\theta}-\dot{\tilde{y}}^2]+mg[\tilde{y}-l\cos{\theta}]\\\\##
##p_{\theta}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}=ml^2\dot{\theta}+ml\dot{\tilde{y}}\sin{\theta}\\
\implies \dot{\theta}=\frac{p_{\theta}-ml\dot{\tilde{y}}\sin{\theta}}{ml^2}\\~~~~~~~~~~~~~=\frac{p_{\theta}}{ml^2}-\frac{\dot{\tilde{y}}}{l}\sin{\theta}\\\\##
After plugging this into the above form of the Hamiltonian and a little simplifying I get:

##H=\frac{m}{2}[\frac{p_{\theta}^2}{m^2l^2}-\frac{2p_{\theta}\dot{\tilde{y}}}{ml}-\dot{\tilde{y}}^2\cos{\theta}^2]+mg[\tilde{y}-l\cos{\theta}]##

I would like to know if this is correct and in particular, if the method is correct.We have not been taught how to take the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian to get the Hamiltonian so I am unsure of the first equation I have listed in "Relevant equations". Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That all looks good to me.
 
It's been a while since I did this, but it looks to me you have two generalized coordinates, ##\theta## and ##y## and you should also consider ##p_y##
 
Henryk said:
It's been a while since I did this, but it looks to me you have two generalized coordinates, ##\theta## and ##y## and you should also consider ##p_y##
The background information for the Lagrangian is not given here. This thread is a continuation of a recent thread https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...range-equation-for-a-special-pendulum.841136/
where ##y(t)## is given to be a specific function of time. So ##y## is not a degree of freedom.
 
Thanks a lot for the help guys, particularly TSny!

And the Hamiltonian will not be conserved in this case right ? We can use ##\frac{dH}{dt}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial t}## which comes out to something ugly and doesn't look like it will reduce to zero... alternatively we can just logically deduce that it won't be conserved since energy is being put into the system to force the support at a specific frequency?
 
The Hamiltonian does not always represent the total energy when the transformation equations from Cartesian coordinates to the generalized coordinates depend explicitly on on time. You can check that your Hamiltonian does not equal the total energy of the pendulum.

A separate question is whether or not the energy will be conserved. As you say, the driving of the pendulum by the moving support will cause the total energy to vary with time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pondzo

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K