Finding the horizontal range without initial velocity

Click For Summary
A locust jumps at an angle of 43.8 degrees and lands 1.0 m away, prompting a calculation for its jump distance at a 62.4-degree angle. Initial velocity components were derived using trigonometric functions, but the calculated distance of 1.39 meters conflicts with the expected answer of 0.82 meters. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying projectile motion equations and understanding the parabolic trajectory of the jumps. Suggestions include sketching the trajectories and utilizing the Range Equation for more accurate results. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful analysis of the problem and consistent application of physics principles.
daniel1991
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A locust jumps at an angle of 43.8 degrees and lands 1.0 m from where it jumped.

If it jumps with the same initial speed at an angle of 62.4 degrees, how far would it jump then?

X-component knowns:
Initial velocity = v(cos(43.8))
displacement = 1m
angle = 43.8 degrees

Y-component knowns:
Initial Velocity= v(sin(43.8))
displacement = 0
acceleration= -9.8m/s^2

Homework Equations


Equation 1:
Image78.gif

Equation 2:
Image106.gif


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I found the distance the projectile traveled at the apex of the y component. I did this by solving
y=tan(43.2)(0.5m)= .46m. I then made .46m my distance and plugged in the relevant info for equation 2 and solved for initial velocity (in the y component). I got 3.63m/s as my answer. My variable for velocity was (-v^2)(sin(43.2)), so i ended up dividing the other side of the equation by sin(43.2) so that may be where i messed up. I just thought since i was solving for a distance in the y-component, and i was using -9.8m/s^2 as my acceleration that i should be consistent.

I used my initial velocity in the y-component to solve for time using equation 1. Then I used the solution for time to solve for initial velocity in the x-component using equation 1. Once I solved for that i used the pythagorean theorem to solve for the actual initial velocity.

To find the range of the x-component with the angel being 62.4 degrees I solved for the y and x components of velocity. I found the time using the y-component of initial velocity and plugging it into the 1st equation. Then used time and the initial velocity in x-component to find the distance using equation 1.

I got 1.39 meters as my final answer. The answer should be .82 meters according to the given solution.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Daniel, and Welcome to the PF.

I didn't quite follow your technique, and if you sketch the two parabolas, you see that the 2nd distance has to be less than 1m.

I approached the problem by first writing vx1 and vx2 as functions of vi and the angles given.

Then write y(t) for each of the two parabolas using your first listed Relevant Equation.

Then set each y(t) = 0 to solve for whan the bug lands back on the ground, and solve for the two times.

Then use that information and your equations for vx1 and vx2 to solve for the 2nd distance. Maybe give that approach a try to see how it works for you. Please show us all of your work on it. :smile:
 
daniel1991 said:
First, I found the distance the projectile traveled at the apex of the y component. I did this by solving
y=tan(43.2)(0.5m)= .46m.

Where did that come from? The trajectory is not a straight line, so no triangle there!

A small hint for a sneaky method: Have you covered the Range Equation yet?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
946
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K