Finding the Intersection of Two Planes: Solving for the Equation of a Line

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tenshou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a line formed by the intersection of two planes defined by the equations 3x1 - 2x2 + x3 = 5 and 2x1 + 3x2 - x3 = -1. Participants explore various methods to approach this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to find the cross product of the planes, while others suggest using elimination to derive relationships between the variables. There are discussions about substituting variables to express x3 in terms of x1 and x2.

Discussion Status

Participants have shared different methods and insights, with some expressing uncertainty about the effectiveness of their approaches. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the calculations involved, and while some guidance has been offered, no consensus on a single method has been reached.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that their calculations were incorrect initially, and there is mention of using matrix methods, including row reduction and null space calculations, to find solutions. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations and methods without resolving the problem definitively.

Tenshou
Messages
153
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the equation of a line of the intersecting planes
##3x_1-2x_2+x_3=5##
##2x_1+3x_2-x_3=-1##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I didn't know where to start but I started at trying to find the cross product of the planes (needless to say it didn't get me and where) I got ##-x_1-5x_2+11x_3## that equation doesn't make any sense x.x I do not know what to do x.x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tenshou said:
What is the equation of a line of the intersecting planes
##3x_1-2x_2+x_3=5##
##2x_1+3x_2-x_3=-1##
first use elimination on the planes, thus add (1)+(2)=5x_1+x_2=4:
solving gives: x_2=4-{5x_1}
take x_1=t thus x_2=4-{5t}
now sub x_1,x_2 into (1) or (2) to find x_3 in terms of t
now you may write up the line in parametric form: (x_1(t),x_2(t),x_3(t))
 
Hi Tenshou! :smile:
Tenshou said:
… I started at trying to find the cross product of the planes (needless to say it didn't get me and where) I got ##-x_1-5x_2+11x_3## …

no, your 11 should be 13, shouldn't it? :wink:

(and i think one of your signs is wrong)

that method should work …

it gives you the direction that is perpendicular to both normals, and therefore it must lie in both planes …

now you have something like x2 = Ax1 + B, x3 = Cx1 + D, where A and C are known,

so you substitute that into the original equations, and that gives you two equations in two unknowns (B and D) …

but I'm not sure that's any quicker than joshmccraney's :smile: method!​
 
Thank you for your insightful answers but I think the easiest solution was IMS... Thank you so much, I mean I just did it this morning (and yes my maths were wrong.) Solved the equation of

##A####x##=##b##

I was looking for the simplest way to solving it and josh, I think your way is the simplest way for solving it(thanks by the way). Although, I still did not get the equation in the book I got ##A## as a 2x3 matrix

##
\left[
\begin{array} {r r r r}
\ 3 &\ -2 &\ 1 \\
\ 2 &\ 3 &\ -1 \\
\end{array}
\right]
##

Then after rref(A) [or something close to it] I got

##
\left[
\begin{array} {r r r r}
\ -7 &\ 0 &\ 1 \\
\ -5 &\ 1 &\ 0 \\
\end{array}
\right]
##

I calculated by Nullity-Rank that I should have one free column left. I solved and got
##
\left[
\begin{array} {r r r r}
\ 0 &\ 4 &\ 13 \\
\end{array}
\right] = x_{part}^T
##

then I just found out the solution to the null space thank you for correcting my maths tiny-tin

##
\left[
\begin{array} {r r r r}
\ -1 &\ 5 &\ 13 \\
\end{array}
\right] = x_{null}^T
##

then I finished up by allowing ##x_{comp}=\lambda x_{null}+x_{part}; \forall \lambda \epsilon\mathbb{R}##

Although I went though a page and a half of calculation I will remember your method josh!

the answer in the book is ##x_1 = -k+1; x_2 = 5k-1; x_3 = 13k; \forall k \epsilon \mathbb{R}##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K