Finding the Inverse Laplace Transform of a Rational Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Laplace transform of the rational function F(s) = (2s + 2) / (s^2 + 4s + 5). Participants are exploring the relevant equations and transformations necessary for this process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rewriting the denominator and factoring the numerator to match known forms of Laplace transforms. There is an attempt to identify constants a and b, and to solve for coefficients in a linear combination of functions. Some participants express confusion about the consistency of the forms and the algebra involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering guidance on how to approach the problem. There is a recognition of the need to determine specific constants to match the original function, but no consensus has been reached on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the challenge of aligning the numerator and denominator with the standard forms of Laplace transforms, indicating potential assumptions or misunderstandings about the transformations involved.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



...find the inverse transform of the given function.

F(s)= (2s+2)/(s2+4s+5)

Homework Equations



On another page, I see these 2:

f(t)=eatsin(bt)--------->F(s)=b/[(s-a)2+b2)
f(t)=eatcos(bt)--------->F(s)=(s-a)/[(s-a)2+b2)

The Attempt at a Solution



This is my first time doing anything with Laplace transforms.

I can change the denominator to (s+2)2 + 1 and factor a -2 out of the numerator. Then it looks like the relevant equations.

-2((s-1/2)/((s+2)2+1))

But I don't understand where to go from here. The -2, of course, is just a constant that can chill out front. Judging from the answer in the back of the book, I use a combination of both relevant equations. Explain the algebra involved here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so a=(-2) and b=1, right? The numerator of the first expression is 1 and the second is s+2. Looks like you want to solve c*1+d*(s+2)=(2s+2) for c and d. Then multiply your first f(t) by c and the second f(t) by d.
 
Dick said:
Ok, so a=(-2) and b=1, right? The numerator of the first expression is 1 and the second is s+2. Looks like you want to solve c*1+d*(s+2)=(2s+2) for c and d. Then multiply your first f(t) by c and the second f(t) by d.

Let's slow down for a second.

I have (s-1/2)/((s+2)2+1).

That isn't in the form b/((s-a)2+b2) because the b's are inconsistent. If I make a=-2, and b=1, the denominator works out, but then the numerator doesn't.

It also isn't in the form (s-a)/((s-a)2+b2) because the a's are inconsistent. If I do the same, the numerator doesn't work out.

Explain this to me as if I was a 5-year-old.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/petoftheday/2008/04/large_thanks.bmp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, five year old. You got the a and b figured out. Multiply each of your t expressions by a separate constant. So the laplace transform of c*e^(-2t)*sin(t) is c*1/((s+2)^2+1) and the laplace transform of d*e^(-2t)*cos(t) is d*(s+2)/((s+2)^2+1). If you add those you get that the laplace transform of e^(-2t)*(c*sin(t)+d*cos(t)) is (c*1+d*(s+2))/((s+2)^1+1). Now you just have to figure out c and d so that (c*1+d*(s+2))=2*s+2.
 
Dick said:
Ok, five year old. You got the a and b figured out. Multiply each of your t expressions by a separate constant. So the laplace transform of c*e^(-2t)*sin(t) is c*1/((s+2)^2+1) and the laplace transform of d*e^(-2t)*cos(t) is d*(s+2)/((s+2)^2+1). If you add those you get that the laplace transform of e^(-2t)*(c*sin(t)+d*cos(t)) is (c*1+d*(s+2))/((s+2)^1+1). Now you just have to figure out c and d so that (c*1+d*(s+2))=2*s+2.

Got it!

Thanks, bro!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K