Finding the magnitude of the electric field from 3 charges at a point P

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnitude of the electric field at point P due to three charges (Q1, Q2, Q3), each valued at 6.4 × 10–19 C, positioned 60 nm apart. The electric field is computed using the formula E = kQ/r2, where k = 8.99 x 109 Nm2/C2. The correct resultant electric field magnitude at point P is determined to be 1.9 x 106 N/C, with the error identified in the calculation of the y-components of the electric fields from charges Q1 and Q3 due to incorrect angle usage in the sine function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Knowledge of vector components in two-dimensional space
  • Ability to perform calculations involving scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation and application of Coulomb's Law in electric field calculations
  • Study the use of trigonometric ratios in resolving vector components
  • Practice problems involving multiple point charges and electric field superposition
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their representation in diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in mastering electric field calculations involving multiple charges.

KKuff
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, here is the problem I'm having trouble with:
Three charges Q1, Q2, and Q3, each equal to 6.4 × 10–19 C, are in a straight line. The distance between neighboring charges is 60 nm. Find the magnitude of the electric field at P, which is 80 nm from Q2 on a line at right angles to the line between Q1 and Q3

Homework Equations



E = kQ/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



The correct answer is 1.9 x 106 N/C, but I cannot figure out how to arrive at that answer.
I started by first finding the magnitude of the electric field from each charge
E1 = kQ1/r2 = (8.99 x 109 Nm2/C2)(6.4 x 10-19C) / (100 x 10-9m)2 = 575360 N/C

E2 = kQ2/r2 = (8.99 x 109 Nm2/C2)(6.4 x 10-19C) / (80 x 10-9m)2 = 899000 N/C

E3 = kQ3/r2 = (8.99 x 109 Nm2/C2)(6.4 x 10-19C) / (100 x 10-9m)2 = 575360 N/C

Then I tried splitting those into the x and y components
Ex = 0, since E1x and E3x cancel each other out and there is no x component of E2

E1y = 575360sin\theta = 345216 N/C
E3y would also equal this
E2y = 899000 N/C

Ey = 1589432

so to find the magnitude of the resultant vector...
E = \sqrt{}(Ex2 + Ey2)
E = \sqrt{}(02 + 15894322) = 1589432
E = 1.59 x 106

So what am I doing wrong here? Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnitudes of the fields for the three charges look okay, but the values you've calculated for the y-components of charges Q1 and Q3 don't look right. Check the angle you've used in the sine function.
 
Hi, thanks for the reply, I got sin\theta = 0.6, using the dimensions of the right triangle with the distance between Q1 and Q2 being 60nm and the distance between Q2 and P being 80nm, so the hypotenuse would be 100nm 602 + 802 = 1002. Then sin\theta = 60nm / 100nm. Is this wrong?
Thanks
 
attachment.php?attachmentid=36847&stc=1&d=1309445903.gif


sin(θ) = 80/100
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 1,569
Thanks, I was using the wrong angle. In the future, how should I go about choosing the correct angle?
 
KKuff said:
Thanks, I was using the wrong angle. In the future, how should I go about choosing the correct angle?

You can use either angle as long as you use the correct trig function! The trig functions are just ratios, as you know.

When you've got all the side lengths for the triangle (as you do in the case of this problem) it's probably easier to just form the correct ratio directly from it; Choose the side that lies in the same direction as the vector component you're looking for and divide by the hypotenuse.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
997
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K