1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Finding the momentum operator matrix of the harmonic oscillator

  1. Nov 20, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Given a particle is confined in a one dimensional harmonic oscillator potential, find the matrix representation of the momentum operator in the basis of the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian.

    2. Relevant equations

    Potential: V(x) = 0.5 m w^2 x^2 where m is the mass of the particle and w is the angular frequency

    Schrodinger equation: H |psi> = E |psi> where H is the Hamiltonian operator, E are its eigenvalues (or the energies of the system), and |psi> are its eigenvectors (or the stationary states of the system).

    E = h w (n + 0.5) where h is the reduced Planck constant, w is the same as in V(x), and n = 1, 2, 3, 4, ...

    |psi> = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator#Hamiltonian_and_energy_eigenstates (look under topic 1.1: Hamiltonian and energy eigenstates)

    3. The attempt at a solution

    This was a question on my midterm exam, and I had absolutely no clue how to tackle it. I still don't. It won't be necessary to do the algebra, but can someone just sketch out the method of obtaining the solution for me?
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 20, 2008 #2
    Somebody feel free to tell me I'm crazy...

    We know the momentum operator can be represented in terms of the creation/annihilation operators as
    [tex]\hat{p}=i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}} \left(\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \right)[/tex]

    so we can find the matrix representing [tex]\hat{p}[/tex] in the usual way of inner products. To wit:
    [tex]A_{m,n} = \left<m\right|i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}} \left(\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \right)\left|n\right> = i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega}{2}}\left[ \left<m\right|\hat{a}^\dagger\left|n\right> - \left<m\right|\hat{a}\left|n\right> \right][/tex].

    You can see from here that the diagonal elements are zero, since [tex]\hat{a}\left|n\right> \propto \left|n-1\right>[/tex] and [tex]\hat{a}^\dagger\left|n\right> \propto \left|n+1\right>[/tex]. In fact, you would expect to have two off-diagonal elements per stationary state [tex]\left|j\right>[/tex], one corresponding to [tex]\left|j-1\right>[/tex] and one corresponding to [tex]\left|j+1\right>[/tex]. I suppose this implies a measurement of [tex]\hat{p}[/tex] yields a linear combination of stationary states (but don't quote me on that one), which would make some sense if [tex]\left[\hat{H},\hat{p}\right] \neq 0[/tex] (don't remember if they do...).

    Last edited: Nov 20, 2008
  4. Nov 20, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yep, that's how you do it.
  5. Nov 20, 2008 #4
    That is correct. H and p don't commute since the creation and annihilation operators don't commute.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook