Finding the parallel resonance formula

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the parallel resonance formula in the context of electrical circuits, specifically focusing on the manipulation of equations involving admittance and resonance conditions. Participants explore mathematical simplifications and clarifications related to the derivation of the resonance frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an admittance equation and attempts to derive the resonance frequency, leading to a formula involving square roots.
  • Another participant suggests a method for simplifying expressions involving square roots, but the original poster expresses uncertainty about its applicability.
  • Several participants discuss the possibility of factoring out terms like ##1/\sqrt{LC}## from the equations to achieve a desired form.
  • One participant questions the clarity and dimensional consistency of the original equations, indicating confusion about the variables used.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of clear questions for better responses and notes potential issues with the interpretation of circuit parameters.
  • A later reply indicates that the original poster successfully simplified the expression, leading to a clearer understanding of the relationship between the variables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding the equations presented. While some participants provide constructive feedback and suggestions, others indicate confusion and disagreement about the definitions and dimensions of the variables involved. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the clarity of the original problem.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential issues with dimensional analysis and variable interpretation, particularly regarding the meaning of ##ω^2_{pr}## and its relation to other parameters. These aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

arhzz
Messages
284
Reaction score
58
Homework Statement
Find the formula for the parallel resonance
Relevant Equations
The Admittance
Hello! I'm having trouble with getting the right result in this litle example. Consider this admittance

$$ C + Cs - w^2_{pr} CCs $$ Now to get the resonance we need to set the imaginary part of the admittance 0.I did that like this

$$0 = C + Cs - w^2_{pr} CCs $$ Now I need to get ## w^2 ## I've added the ## -w^2 CCs ## to both sides of the equation. Now I have this

$$ w^2 LCCs = C+Cs $$ Now I put the LCCs on the other side of the equation
$$ w^2 = \frac{C+Cs}{LCCs} $$ Now get rid of the square on the left and we get this
$$ w = \sqrt{\frac{C+Cs}{LCCS}} $$ And now I'd assume some simplifications are made because the result looks like this

$$ w = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\sqrt{ 1 + \frac{C}{Cs}} $$

I've tried splitting the fraciton inside the root to simplify but I am not getting there.Some help would be great,thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it help if you could do something like this?
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \cdot 4}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4}}$$
 
Joshy said:
Would it help if you could do something like this?
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \cdot 4}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{4}}$$
Well it certainly would but I am not seeing such a scenario here? I don't have 1 over something and I don't know if I can split anyting the way you split the root of 8.
 
Well, in your final answer or what you're trying to massage it to you have a ##1/\sqrt{LC}##. Is it possible from the step you have before that... to pull out a ##1/\sqrt{LC}##?

Just a reminder of what you currently have in your original post, right?
$$\omega = \sqrt{ \frac{C + C_{S}}{LC \cdot C_{S}} } = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{LC} \frac{C + C_{S}}{C_{S}}}$$
 
Joshy said:
Well, in your final answer or what you're trying to massage it to you have a ##1/\sqrt{LC}##. Is it possible from the step you have before that... to pull out a ##1/\sqrt{LC}##?

Just a reminder of what you currently have in your original post, right?
$$\omega = \sqrt{ \frac{C + C_{S}}{LC \cdot C_{S}} } = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{LC} \frac{C + C_{S}}{C_{S}}}$$
$$ \omega = \sqrt{\frac{C+C_{S}}{LC \cdot C_{S}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}} \cdot \sqrt{ 1 + \frac{C}{C_{S}}} $$

This is what I need to "show" or achieve if you will.Your post is close,we could split the root but we would have ## \frac{C+Cs}{Cs} ## and it should be ## 1 + \frac{C}{Cs} ##
 
Is there another way you can write?
$$\frac{C + C_S}{C_S}$$
You're almost there.
 
I must admit that I do not understand your equations at all.
Is "C" an admittance? And what about "w²CCs" ? Also an admittance? Both appear within one formula...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
I know a lot about resonant circuits, yet your presentation of this problem has greatly exceeded my interest in deciphering your work. You'll get better answers if you ask better questions.

There appears to be some problems with dimensions, or with my interpretation of what L, C, ω, or s are. If you use those the way most EEs do then your equations don't make sense. For example, I would bet that no one reading this knows what ##ω^2_{pr}## is; although you imply it's also equal to ##ω^2L##, whatever that is.
 
Joshy said:
Is there another way you can write?
$$\frac{C + C_S}{C_S}$$
You're almost there.
Ah I got it $$ \frac{C}{Cs} + \frac{Cs}{Cs} $$ the second fraction will cancel out leaving me with

$$\frac{C}{Cs} + 1 $$

Thanks !
 
  • #10
DaveE said:
I know a lot about resonant circuits, yet your presentation of this problem has greatly exceeded my interest in deciphering your work. You'll get better answers if you ask better questions.

There appears to be some problems with dimensions, or with my interpretation of what L, C, ω, or s are. If you use those the way most EEs do then your equations don't make sense. For example, I would bet that no one reading this knows what ##ω^2_{pr}## is; although you imply it's also equal to ##ω^2L##, whatever that is.
Maybe I rushed it a little,this is just the last part of a pretty big example (with a circuit ).I was not sure what to put in the title of my question because the only problem I was facing is just the math to get the simplification.
 
  • #11
I think you were fine. I'm glad you solved the problem :) great job
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arhzz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K