Finding the resultant force on the block

AI Thread Summary
To find the resultant force on the block, the discussion emphasizes using vector addition techniques. The approach involves splitting forces into right-angled triangles and applying trigonometry to determine the resultant. It is important to connect the tip of one vector to the tail of another to visualize the resultant vector accurately. The Pythagorean theorem is applicable for vectors at right angles, while the parallelogram rule is suggested for general cases. Accurate drawing and measurement can help verify the calculated resultant force.
ameliapond
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all, I've been given a question for homework and I am not 100% sure how to do it exactly!
I have included a diagram or the situation

Homework Equations


The question is Find the resultant force on the block (picture attached)


The Attempt at a Solution


What i did was, split it into 2 right angled triangles and used trig to determine the resultant force. do i add the two together to get the resultant force?
 

Attachments

  • resultant force.jpg
    resultant force.jpg
    3.4 KB · Views: 587
Physics news on Phys.org
If adding vectors at right angles you can use pythagorous

c2 = a2 +b2

to work out the magnitude.

Try drawing the 20N vector as if it was attached to the other end of the 48N vector.
 
so the resultant is the line that would connect the two vectors?
 
ameliapond said:
so the resultant is the line that would connect the two vectors?
As you have drawn them, the tail of one is connected to the tail of the other.

To perform a vector addition:
you translate one of the vectors, (i.e., using a sliding transformation) so that the tip[/color] of one arrow connects to the tail[/color] of the other. Then you draw a third arrow from the tail of that combo to its tip, and this third arrow represents the vector sum of that pair. Use your knowledge of trig to find its length. (As a check: if you draw them accurately to scale and preserve angles, your calculated value should agree with your measured value.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top