Finding the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole

In summary: The determinant of the Kerr metric, as you have correctly calculated, is given by:det(g_{ab})={\frac{1}{\delta}}\left(- \left( \sin \left( \theta \right) \left( \Delta\,{a}^{2}-{r}^{4}-2\,{r}^{2}{a}^{2}-{a}^{4} \right) \right) ^{2}\Delta+ \left( \sin \left( \theta \right) \left( \Delta\,{a}^{2}-{r}^{4}-2\,{r}^{2}{a}^{2}-{a}^{4} \
  • #1
TheMan112
43
1
I'm trying to find the coordinates where the determinant of the Kerr metric goes towards infinity. This should give the ring singularity of a Kerr (rotating) black hole. So, I'm starting out with the standard form Kerr metric in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates:

[tex]ds^2=\frac{\Delta}{\rho^2}(dt-a sin^2 \theta d\phi)^2-\frac{sin^2\theta}{\rho^2}((r^2+a^2)d\phi-a dt)^2-\frac{\rho^2}{\Delta}dr^2-\rho^2d\phi[/tex]

Then I break out the terms [tex]dt^2, dr^2, d\theta^2, d\phi^2[/tex] and [tex]dt d\phi[/tex], this gives the metric:

[tex]g_{ab} = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} \frac{\Delta-a^2 sin^2\theta}{\rho^2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{2a sin^2\theta (r^2+a^2-\Delta)}{\rho^2} \\ 0 & -\frac{\rho^2}{\Delta} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \rho^2 & 0 \\ \frac{2a sin^2\theta (r^2+a^2-\Delta)}{\rho^2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{sin^2 \theta (\Delta a^2 -(r^2 + a^2)^2)}{\rho^2} \end{array} \right)[/tex]

Calculating the determinant of this matrix in Maple gives the expression:

[tex]det(g_{ab})={\frac{1}{\delta}}\left(- \left( \sin \left( \theta \right) \left( \Delta\,{a}^{2}-{r
}^{4}-2\,{r}^{2}{a}^{2}-{a}^{4} \right) \right) ^{2}\Delta+ \left(
\sin \left( \theta \right) \left( \Delta\,{a}^{2}-{r}^{4}-2\,{r}^{2}{
a}^{2}-{a}^{4} \right) \right) ^{2}{a}^{2} \left( \sin \left( \theta
\right) \right) ^{2}+4\,{a}^{2} \left( \sin \left( \theta \right)
\right) ^{4}{r}^{4}+8\,{a}^{4} \left( \sin \left( \theta \right)
\right) ^{4}{r}^{2}[/tex]
[tex]-8\,{a}^{2} \left( \sin \left( \theta \right)
\right) ^{4}{r}^{2}\Delta+4\,{a}^{6} \left( \sin \left( \theta
\right) \right) ^{4}-8\,{a}^{4} \left( \sin \left( \theta \right)
\right) ^{4}\Delta+4\,{a}^{2} \left( \sin \left( \theta \right)
\right) ^{4}{\Delta}^{2}[/tex][tex])[/tex]

Are my calculations correct? And how can I find the coordinates where it goes towards infinity in an analytical way? I'm not even sure how to plot the determinant on a computer given I'm not entirely used to Boyer-Lindquist coordinates.

Edit: Pardon the "bad" thread title, I pushed the submit button rather prematurely.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Consider coordinate systems [itex]\left\{x^\alpha \right\}[/itex] and [itex]\left\{x^{\alpha'}\right\}[/itex]. The components of the metric with respect to the two coordinate systems are related by

[tex]
g_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{\partial x^{\gamma'}}{\partial x^\alpha} \frac{\partial x^{\delta'}}{\partial x^\alpha} g_{\gamma' \delta'}.
[/tex]

Thus,

[tex]
\det \left[ g_{\alpha \beta} \right] = \det \left[ \frac{\partial x^{\gamma'}}{\partial x^\alpha} \right] \det \left[ \frac{\partial x^{\delta'}}{\partial x^\alpha} \right] \det \left[ g_{\gamma' \delta'} \right],
[/tex]

so the determinant of the metric could be unproblematic in one coordinate system and zero or infinite in another coordinate systems because of a problem with coordinates, i.e., the because the determinant of the matrix of coordinate partials is zero or blows up.

Consequently, it is not sufficient to use the determinant of the metric to find real singularities.

Out of curiosity, what books are you using for your study of general relativity?
 
  • #3
George Jones said:
Consider coordinate systems [itex]\left\{x^\alpha \right\}[/itex] and [itex]\left\{x^{\alpha'}\right\}[/itex]. The components of the metric with respect to the two coordinate systems are related by

[tex]
g_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{\partial x^{\gamma'}}{\partial x^\alpha} \frac{\partial x^{\delta'}}{\partial x^\alpha} g_{\gamma' \delta'}.
[/tex]

Thus,

[tex]
\det \left[ g_{\alpha \beta} \right] = \det \left[ \frac{\partial x^{\gamma'}}{\partial x^\alpha} \right] \det \left[ \frac{\partial x^{\delta'}}{\partial x^\alpha} \right] \det \left[ g_{\gamma' \delta'} \right],
[/tex]

so the determinant of the metric could be unproblematic in one coordinate system and zero or infinite in another coordinate systems because of a problem with coordinates, i.e., the because the determinant of the matrix of coordinate partials is zero or blows up.

Consequently, it is not sufficient to use the determinant of the metric to find real singularities.

Out of curiosity, what books are you using for your study of general relativity?

Yes, but shouldn't the ring singularity be a singularity regardless of the coordinate system used? Just like the point-singularity in a non-rotating black hole. Which coordinate system would you use if not Boyer-Lindquist?

I'm using Ray D'Inverno's "Introducing Einstein's Relativity" btw. If you have the book, the equation I'm starting out from is (19.27).

Regards
 
  • #4
TheMan112 said:
Yes, but shouldn't the ring singularity be a singularity regardless of the coordinate system used? Just like the point-singularity in a non-rotating black hole. Which coordinate system would you use if not Boyer-Lindquist?

I'm using Ray D'Inverno's "Introducing Einstein's Relativity" btw. If you have the book, the equation I'm starting out from is (19.27).

Regards

My point is that while a coordinate-based method can be useful for identifying *potential* singularities, it cannot pin down with certainty that something is an "actual* singularity. Some other coordinate-independent method is needed.

On page 254, d'Inverno gives a method that works for Kerr - the blowing up of the coordinate-independent quantity

[tex]R^{abcd} R_{abcd}.[/tex]
 
  • #5


I have a similar problem and just wondering

is Δ=r2+a2-2Mr

where

a = angular momentum/Mass
M =Mass of the black hole
r= what radius? radius of the black hole or radius of the "ring"
ρ2=r2+a2+cos2θ


?
 
  • #6


You've revived a bit of an old thread here but for the record, r is the distance from the centre of the object of gravity to the observer, M is the gravitational radius of the object (M=Gm/c^2), a is the spin parameter of the object (a=J/mc). Incidentally a/M will provide you with a unitless spin parameter between 0 and 1, 0 being static, 1 being maximal (i.e. a=M).

The second equation should be written [itex]\rho^2=r^2+a^2cos^2\theta[/itex] and represents the oblate nature of a rapidly spinning object ([itex]\theta[/itex] being the angle between the z axis (i.e. pole) and the line of approach).

The radial http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_vector_field" (named after W. Killing) for a Kerr black hole can be expressed as-

[tex]g_{rr}=\frac{\rho^2}{\Delta}[/tex]

becoming null at [itex]r_\pm=M\pm\sqrt{M^2-a^2}[/itex] where [itex]r_+[/itex] is the outer event horizon and [itex]r_-[/itex] is the inner event horizon.

The azimuth Killing vector field can be expressed as-

[tex]g_{tt}=\frac{\Delta-a^2sin^2\theta}{\rho^2}[/tex]

becoming zero at [itex]r_e=M+\sqrt{M^2-a^2cos^2\theta}[/itex], the ergosphere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7


My problem is as follows:
"Calculate the determinant of the Kerr metric. Locate the plac where it is infinite. (In fact, this gives the "ring"-singularity och the Kerr black hole, which is the only one)

I got the determinant to :

7a2r4sin4θ+7a4r2sin4θ-8a2r2sin4θ-16Ma2r3sin4θ+16M2a2r2sin4θ-2Ma4rsin4θ+2a2r4sin2θ+a4r2sin2θ+r6sin2θ+2Ma4rsin2θ-4M2a2r2sin2θ-2Mr2sin2θ

all devided by r2 + a2 - 2Mr

and I talked to my prefessor and he told me that the answer should be the equation of a ring in spherical coordinates, I have all this in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates I believe, and according to wikipedia

{x} = \sqrt {r^2 + a^2} \sin\theta\cos\phi
{y} = \sqrt {r^2 + a^2} \sin\theta\sin\phi
{z} = r \cos\theta

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyer-Lindquist_coordinates)


I don't get it to be an eq of a ring (or circle) .. please help =)
 
  • #8

Related to Finding the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole

1. What is a ring-singularity?

A ring-singularity is a hypothetical point of infinite density and zero volume that is believed to exist at the center of rotating black holes. It is surrounded by a spinning ring of matter, which gives it its characteristic shape.

2. How do scientists find the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole?

Scientists use mathematical models and simulations to study the behavior of rotating black holes and make predictions about the location and properties of the ring-singularity. They also use observations of the effects of a black hole's gravitational pull on its surroundings to gather evidence for the existence of the ring-singularity.

3. What is the significance of finding the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole?

Finding the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole would provide valuable insights into the fundamental nature of space, time, and gravity. It could also help us better understand the behavior of black holes and their role in the formation and evolution of galaxies.

4. Is it possible to physically observe the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole?

No, it is not currently possible to physically observe the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole. The extreme gravitational forces and intense radiation near the event horizon make it impossible for any spacecraft or telescope to get close enough to capture an image of it.

5. Are there any theories about what happens inside the ring-singularity of a rotating black hole?

There are some theories that suggest the ring-singularity may be a gateway to another universe or a higher dimension. However, the true nature of what happens inside a black hole, including the ring-singularity, is still unknown and remains a subject of ongoing research and debate among scientists.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
44
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
558
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
980
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
826
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
640
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
Back
Top