Finding the Smallest Possible Value of N in a Simple Number Theory Problem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fragment
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Number theory Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the smallest possible value of a positive integer N, given that the product of any two of the integers 30, 72, and N is divisible by the third. Participants explore various approaches to solve this number theory problem, including reasoning, prime factorization, and the use of the greatest common divisor (gcd).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that N cannot be smaller than the gcd of 30 and 72 and cannot exceed their product, proposing N=60 based on a pattern observed in calculations.
  • Another participant introduces a formula involving the gcd, stating that the product of the two integers divided by the gcd squared gives a relationship that can be used to find N.
  • A different approach using prime factorization is presented, where the participant analyzes the prime factors of 30 and 72 to determine the form that N must take, concluding that N must be a product of the primes 2, 3, and 5 within certain constraints.
  • Further elaboration on the prime factorization method includes specific inequalities that p, q, and r must satisfy to find the smallest N.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the assistance received, indicating a clearer understanding of the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants explore multiple methods to approach the problem, with no consensus on a single method being superior or definitive. Various interpretations and calculations lead to different insights, but agreement on a specific solution remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on different mathematical properties and reasoning techniques, with some steps and assumptions remaining implicit. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical intricacies involved in determining the smallest N.

Fragment
Messages
149
Reaction score
3
Positive integers 30, 72, and N have the property that the product of any two of them is divisible by the third. What is the smallest possible value of N?

Note I have not yet taken a Number Theory course.

I think I have found the solution using a bit of reasoning and some luck. N=60? I figured N could not be smaller than the gcd of 30 and 72, and could not be greater than their product. I also found a pattern for (30N)/72. Inputting 10, 15, 20, 30 for N gave a result of 25/6, 25/4, 25/3, 25/2, respectively. I figured that this converged to 25/1, which would then be my solution. N=60 indeed yields 25/1.

However, I feel that this is closer to luck than anything else, and also it is not very elegant. Can someone show me another way of doing this, perhaps something more elegant?


-F
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the best you can do is first/gcd(first, second) * second/gcd(first, second) = first * second / gcd(first, second)^2.
 
CRGreathouse said:
I think the best you can do is first/gcd(first, second) * second/gcd(first, second) = first * second / gcd(first, second)^2.

Why does this work?

Another solution I tried was prime factorization. A*N/B=5N/12 and B*N/A=2^2*3*N/5

Therefore N is the lowest common multiple multiple of 12 and 5, which is 60.
 
Last edited:
The prime factorization of 30 is 2(3)(5) and the prime factorization of 72 is 2^3(3^2). In order that N divide their product, which is 2^4(3^3)(5), it must have only factors of 2, 3, and 5- it must be of the form (2^p)(3^q)(5^r) with p a non-negative integer less than or equal to 4, q a non-negative integer less than or equal to 3, and r either 0 or 1.

Now, 30N= 2^{p+1}(3^{q+1})(5^{r+1}) and that must be divisible by 2^3(3^2) so p+ 1 must be larger than or equal to 3- p must be larger than or equal to 2- and q+ 1 must be larger than or equal to 2: q must be larger than or equal to 1.

72N= 2^{p+3}3^{q+ 1}5^r and that must be divisible by 2(3)(5) so p+3 must be larger than or equal to 1, which is neccesarily true since 0+ 3> 1, q+ 1 must be larger than 1, which, again, is necessarily true, and r must be larger than or equal to 1.

So we have: N= 2^p(3^q)(5^r) where p, q, and r are non-negative integers satisfying p larger than or equal to 2, q larger than or equal to 1, and r larger than or equal to 1.

We find the smallest possible value of k by taking p, q, and r to be the smallest possible.
 
Thank you very much for the help, it cleared up my confusion. I understand a little more now. :smile:


-F
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
921
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K