Finding the Standard Matrix Representation for T1T2: A Non-Standard Product?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the standard matrix representation for the composition of two transformations, T1 and T2, in a linear algebra context. The original poster presents a problem involving the application of these transformations and seeks clarification on the correct approach to represent their product.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the correct interpretation of the product of transformations, with some suggesting that T1(T2(x)) is not the same as T1(x) * T2(x). There are attempts to derive the matrix representation of the transformations and questions about the correctness of the resulting matrices.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's matrix calculations and interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the proper multiplication of matrices corresponding to the transformations, and there is an acknowledgment of mistakes made in previous attempts.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the terminology and representation of the transformations, as well as the potential for errors in matrix setup. Participants are reflecting on their understanding of the transformations and their representations.

DanielFaraday
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a slight variation of the last problem I posted.

Write the standard matrix representation for T1T2 and use it to find [T1T2(1,-3,0)]E.

Homework Equations



[tex] T_1\left(x_1,x_2,x_3\right)=\left(x_3,-x_1,x_3\right)[/tex]

[tex] T_2\left(x_1,x_2,x_3\right)=\left(x_3-x_1,x_3-2x_2-x_1,x_1-x_3\right)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] T_1T_2=\left(x_3,-x_1,x_3\right)\cdot \left(x_3-x_1,x_3-2x_2-x_1,x_1-x_3\right)=x_1^2+2 x_1 x_2-x_1 x_3[/tex]

[tex] A=\left(x_1^2+2 x_1 x_2-x_1 x_3\right)\left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

Will A just end up being an identity matrix multiplied by the scalar that results from T1T2, or should I use a non-standard product for T1T2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it all wrong. T1*T2(x) means T1(T2(x)). That's nothing like T1(x)*T2(x) whatever that means. Find the matrices corresponding to T1 and T2 and multiply them.
 
Is this right, then?

[tex] A=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> -1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)\cdot \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> -1 & -2 & 1 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & -1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & -1 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & -1 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & -1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
 
DanielFaraday said:
Is this right, then?

[tex] A=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> -1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)\cdot \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> -1 & -2 & 1 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & -1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)=\left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & -1 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & -1 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & -1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]

Almost. But why are there two 1's in the third column of the first matrix?
 
Thanks!

There are two 1's in the third column of the first matrix because there is an x3 in the first and last element of T1 (is that the right terminology?)
 
DanielFaraday said:
Thanks!

There are two 1's in the third column of the first matrix because there is an x3 in the first and last element of T1 (is that the right terminology?)

You were right. My mistake.
 
I made a mistake with that same transformation on another thread. There's something about that transformation... it's pretty sneaky
 
Must be us. DanielFaraday didn't have a problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K