Finding the Unknown Resistance Value

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the unknown resistance value (R) in a circuit involving resistors R1 (70.00 Ω), R2 (50.00 Ω), and R3 (62.00 Ω) with a voltage of 15 V. Participants emphasize that Ohm's Law is sufficient for this problem, rather than Kirchhoff's rules. The key takeaway is that the current through R1 can be expressed as 70R/(70+R) when the switches are closed, and understanding the circuit configuration is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with series and parallel resistor calculations
  • Basic circuit analysis skills
  • Knowledge of electrical components like resistors and switches
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Ohm's Law applications in circuit analysis
  • Learn about series and parallel resistor configurations
  • Explore circuit simplification techniques for complex circuits
  • Investigate the role of switches in electrical circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, hobbyists working on circuit design, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of resistor networks and circuit analysis.

Lamp Guy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The current going through the resistor R1 in the figure does not change whether the two switches S1 and S2 are both open or both closed. The resistances are R1 = 70.00 Ω, R2 = 50.00 Ω, and R3 = 62.00 Ω. The voltage is V = 15 V. With this information, what is the value of the unknown resistance R? Recall that a conducting wire can be treated as a resistor of 0 Ω, and points on a wire between resistors are at the same potential. Hint:
Kirchoff's rules are useful here.

The image is found here: http://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/current-going-resistor-r1-figure-change-whether-two-switches-s1-s2-open-closed-resistances-q4890516

Homework Equations


R(for series)=R1+R2+R3
R(for parallel)=R1*R2/(R1+R2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to add up all three resistors originally and got 182 ohms total, then made that equal to 50 + (70R)/(70+R) but it's not working. Not quite sure how to apply Kirchoff's rules here so any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain why you added up some resistor values? That will indicate whether you see the problem clearly.

You don't need Kirchoff's Laws, specifically. Ohm's Law will suffice. :)
 
I added them up because it said that the current is the same no matter what, so that's how I found the overall current.
 
Lamp Guy said:
I added them up because it said that the current is the same no matter what, so that's how I found the overall current.
Okay. That's with the switches in the positions shown? What numbers did you add? Did you do the addition in your head, or did you use a calculator?
 
i added 70, 50 and 62 to get 183.
 
182*
 
Lamp Guy said:
182*
Okay. (I was using the values on the figure.)

So that will allow you to calculate the current in R1? What value is it?

Next, how to determine R1's current with the switches closed?
 
Lamp Guy said:
... then made that equal to 50 + (70R)/(70+R) but it's not working. Not quite sure how to apply Kirchoff's rules here so any help would be appreciated.
What you are doing here is setting the battery currents equal, because you are equating the loop resistances. BUT the current through R1 is only a fraction of the battery current, with the switches closed.

So you have yet to find an expression for the current through R1 with switches closed. It would be a good idea to redraw the circuit as simply as possible, so you see clearly what is needed.
 
How do I find out what the current through R1 is? I thought that since it was parallel with the missing R, it would be 70R/(70+R). I've never worked with switches so I'm pretty confused by them.
 
  • #10
Lamp Guy said:
How do I find out what the current through R1 is? I thought that since it was parallel with the missing R, it would be 70R/(70+R).
70R/(70+R) is the equivalent resistance of the parallel pair. Once you know the current through that pair then you need to sort out how much of it goes through each.

I've never worked with switches so I'm pretty confused by them.
That's why I suggested you redraw the circuit with the bare minimum necessary, for clarity. Draw it with no switches, etc. :cool:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
929
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K