Finding the Velocity of a Spaceship Using Special Relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a spaceship traveling from Earth to a star located six light-years away, as measured in the context of special relativity. The spaceship's rest mass is given, and the time experienced by the occupants is noted as 2.5 years. Participants are exploring the implications of time dilation and length contraction in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Lorentz transformations and the relationship between distance, speed, and time in different reference frames. There is an exploration of how to express time in terms of the spaceship's frame and the Earth frame, as well as the implications of using different frames for calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to relate the variables involved, while others are questioning their assumptions and calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of reference frames and the need for careful consideration in the calculations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, and productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the nuances of special relativity, particularly regarding the consistency of velocity across different frames of reference. There are indications of confusion regarding time dilation and the proper application of the relevant equations.

cjkent
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spaceship travels from Earth to the vicinity of the star that is measured
by astronomers on Earth to be six light-years away. The spaceship
and its occupants have a total rest mass of 32 000 kg. Assume that the
spaceship travels at constant velocity. The time taken as measured by
clocks on the spaceship is 2.5 years

i) Calculate the velocity of the spaceship.

There are other parts but I think once I find the velocity I should be able to do them


Homework Equations



I'm not sure exactly if it's using Lorentz transformations or just time dilation/length contraction. In any case here are those formulae:

ΔT=γΔT 0
L=L 0 /γ

Δx ′ =γ(Δx−vΔt)
Δt ′ =γ(Δt−vΔx/c 2 )

The Attempt at a Solution



So I set the distance from Earth to the star as the standard length, L 0, and the time taken as measured by the spaceship to be ΔT. To find the velocity I then tried to find either ΔT 0 or L to substitute into v =Δx/Δt but to compute both I needed the velocity for γ.

Of course I tried it algebraically, solving for v but ended up with a polynomial I couldn't solve. I can post the working if necessary but I have a feeling I've made a more fundamental error with my reference frames which are still confusing me a bit.


Please help me physicsforums, you're my only hope!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Start by relating distance speed and time, all in the Earth frame.
 
cjkent said:

Homework Statement



A spaceship travels from Earth to the vicinity of the star that is measured
by astronomers on Earth to be six light-years away. The spaceship
and its occupants have a total rest mass of 32 000 kg. Assume that the
spaceship travels at constant velocity. The time taken as measured by
clocks on the spaceship is 2.5 years

i) Calculate the velocity of the spaceship.

There are other parts but I think once I find the velocity I should be able to do them


Homework Equations



I'm not sure exactly if it's using Lorentz transformations or just time dilation/length contraction. In any case here are those formulae:

ΔT=γΔT 0
L=L 0 /γ

Δx ′ =γ(Δx−vΔt)
Δt ′ =γ(Δt−vΔx/c 2 )

The Attempt at a Solution



So I set the distance from Earth to the star as the standard length, L 0, and the time taken as measured by the spaceship to be ΔT. To find the velocity I then tried to find either ΔT 0 or L to substitute into v =Δx/Δt but to compute both I needed the velocity for γ.

Of course I tried it algebraically, solving for v but ended up with a polynomial I couldn't solve. I can post the working if necessary but I have a feeling I've made a more fundamental error with my reference frames which are still confusing me a bit.


Please help me physicsforums, you're my only hope!

If you know Δt and Δt', then you know γ. Or, using the Lorentz Transformation, in the spaceship frame S', Δx' is zero. This, of course, gives Δt' = Δt / γ.
 
Thanks so much guys for the speedy replies.

Doc Al said:
Hint: Start by relating distance speed and time, all in the Earth frame.

Is that not just v=L/T where the L and T were both measured in the Earth frame?
(forgive the notation I'm trying to be consistent with those in the other equations)


@chestermiller
But I don't have Δt do I? Only the time as measured on the spaceship.
 
cjkent said:
Is that not just v=L/T where the L and T were both measured in the Earth frame?
Yes, that's all it is. Now express T in terms of the spaceship time (which was given).
 
doc al said:
yes, that's all it is. Now express t in terms of the spaceship time (which was given).

t= t'γ

Edit: and then I subbed that into v=L/t giving v=L/(t'γ)

but then γ=1/ √(1−(v^2 /c^2))
 
Last edited:
cjkent said:
t= t'γ
Good. Now combine those into a single equation. The only unknown will be v.
 
Doc Al said:
Good. Now combine those into a single equation. The only unknown will be v.

Yep sorry as I was tryng to edit on my last post I did that giving v=L/(t'γ)

but then γ=1/ √(1−(v^2 /c^2)) which is dependent on v

Thanks again for the help. I hope this isn't just me being incredibly dense.
 
cjkent said:
Yep sorry as I was tryng to edit on my last post I did that giving v=L/(t'γ)
Good.
but then γ=1/ √(1−(v^2 /c^2)) which is dependent on v
Sure. Good thing v is what you want to find.

Hint: Square both sides of your equation.
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
Good.

Sure. Good thing v is what you want to find.

Hint: Square both sides of your equation.


Got it now great! For some reason when I tried this earlier I got t and t' muddled in the time dilation equation so then when I progressed I got (v^4)/(c^2) + v^2 etc and couldn't solve it. My final answer came to be 0.92c which seems reasonable and checks out fine.
Thanks for being patient and helping out.

ps. I'm still kicking myself
 
  • #11
can i ask a question,if i did all the calculations in the spaceship's frame,i had v=0.70c,why is it wrong?
 
  • #12
jianghan said:
can i ask a question,if i did all the calculations in the spaceship's frame,i had v=0.70c,why is it wrong?
What exactly did you do?
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
What exactly did you do?

i assumed v=kc,therefore distance as measured by spaceship=6√(1-k2) light yrs, time=2.5 light yrs and velocity=6√(1-k2) /2.5 =k

solving the above equation,i have... WOW, k=0.923
ok,i think i don't have a problem anymore now that i can get v=0.923c

maybe previously i got the calculation wrong,i actually believe the velocity of spaceship should be the same no matter which reference frame i use to calculate,because velocity is usually the only thing that doesn't change across reference frames(?)

Thank you still for trying to help^^
 
  • #14
jianghan said:
i assumed v=kc,therefore distance as measured by spaceship=6√(1-k2) light yrs, time=2.5 light yrs and velocity=6√(1-k2) /2.5 =k

solving the above equation,i have... WOW, k=0.923
ok,i think i don't have a problem anymore now that i can get v=0.923c
Good.

maybe previously i got the calculation wrong,i actually believe the velocity of spaceship should be the same no matter which reference frame i use to calculate,because velocity is usually the only thing that doesn't change across reference frames(?)
You are correct: The relative velocity between two frames is the same in both frames. (Except for sign, of course.) That's why I knew you must have made an error, since you can do this calculation starting from either frame.
 
  • #15
You are correct: The relative velocity between two frames is the same in both frames. (Except for sign, of course.) That's why I knew you must have made an error, since you can do this calculation starting from either frame.

Thank you for the clear explanation,now i have no doubt about this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K