Spaceship voyage at close to light speeds

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a spaceship traveling close to the speed of light to reach a planet 2 million light years away, with constraints on food and energy lasting 10 years for the crew. The discussion centers on the calculations related to time dilation, length contraction, and the implications of relativistic speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for the speed required for the spaceship, questioning the assumptions made regarding distance and reference frames. There are also inquiries about the implications of relativistic effects on time and distance as perceived by the crew versus observers on Earth.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on calculations and assumptions. Some have pointed out errors in the initial distance assumption, while others explore the implications of very small numbers in calculations. There is a focus on refining the understanding of the relationship between speed and relativistic effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which includes specific parameters for distance and time. The discussion reflects a need to clarify these parameters and their impact on the calculations being performed.

Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


The last of the human race are leaving the earth, after a total nuclear destruction, to reach the only known planet suitable for lives, 2 million light years away from earth. They are traveling on the spaceship ARK, capable of close to speed of light. There is only enough food and energy to last 10 years for those on board.

a). How fast must the ship travel so that the human race survive?
b) If you made any assumption in part a), state it and justify it using your final results.
c) In the eyes of the ship crew, how far did they travel when they reach the planet?
d) In your calculation, which reference frame is the “proper frame”?Just posting my work to see if anybody can spot any errors with it. Thank you all in advance!

Homework Equations


Δt = Δt_p*γ

L = (L_p)/γ

γ = 1/sqrt(1-β^2 )

β = v/c

c = 3 * 10^8 m/s

L_p = 1.892 *10^16 m

Δt_p = 3.154 *10^8 s

The Attempt at a Solution



a.) since the passengers only have 10 years worth of food, that is by definition the max proper time interval (Δt_p) for them to reach the new planet, as measured by the passengers on the spaceship.

Δt_p = L/v plugging in the length contraction relation ---> Δt_p = (L_p)/(γ*v)

v*Δt_p = L_p * sqrt(1-β^2) ... after some algebra i get

β = 1/sqrt[ (c*Δt_p/L_p)^2 + 1] ... plugging in the numbers i get

β = 0.196 ... hence v = 0.196*c

b.) since the distance between the Earth and the new planet is given to be 2 light years, I assumed that they are at rest with respect to each other. This assumption is used when the passengers measure the time interval Δt_p = L/v. Since the ship is at rest with respect to itself, and the planets are at rest with respect to each other, that means that the planet is approaching the spaceship at the same speed that Earth is receding away from the spaceship, speed v.

c.) L = (L_p)/γ ... plugging in the numbers

L = 1.86 * 10^16 m

d.) There is no proper frame of reference, each is equivalent to the other by the first postulate of special relativity. The proper time is measured by the passengers on the spaceship, and the proper length is measured by those at rest on Earth with respect to those on the other planet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks good except that the problem gives a distance of 2 million light years instead of 2 light years.
 
TSny said:
Your work looks good except that the problem gives a distance of 2 million light years instead of 2 light years.
oh woops, thank you for that. Would have sucked to get points taken away for that lol
 
TSny said:
Your work looks good except that the problem gives a distance of 2 million light years instead of 2 light years.
My calculator is giving me β = 1 when I change L_p to be 1.892 * 10^22 m. Am I missing something?
 
In the equation β = 1/sqrt[ (c*Δt_p/L_p)2 + 1], the quantity (c*Δt_p/L_p)2 is a very small number (but it is not zero). So you can see that β should be very close to 1, but not actually equal to one. Your calculator might not be able to handle the very small numbers.

But note that you can write β as β = (1 + x)-1/2, where x is the small number (c*Δt_p/L_p)2.
Do you know how to approximate (1 + x)-1/2 for small x?

Also, there is no need to convert the distance to meters and the time to seconds. To evaluate the quantity c*Δt_p/L_p you can use distance units of light years and time units of years. What is the value of c in these units?
 
TSny said:
In the equation β = 1/sqrt[ (c*Δt_p/L_p)2 + 1], the quantity (c*Δt_p/L_p)2 is a very small number (but it is not zero). So you can see that β should be very close to 1, but not actually equal to one. Your calculator might not be able to handle the very small numbers.

But note that you can write β as β = (1 + x)-1/2, where x is the small number (c*Δt_p/L_p)2.
Do you know how to approximate (1 + x)-1/2 for small x?

Also, there is no need to convert the distance to meters and the time to seconds. To evaluate the quantity c*Δt_p/L_p you can use distance units of light years and time units of years. What is the value of c in these units?
β = 1/sqrt[ (c*Δt_p/L_p)^2 + 1] is approximately 1 + (-1/2)*((c*Δt_p/L_p)^2) for small x = (c*Δt_p/L_p) . and I see what you mean about the units. c = 1 light year/year by definition. funny enough my calculator still gives me β = 1 with this approximation, but I definitely see how its not exactly equal to 1 now. I think its fine to simply say β = 0.99 right?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
β = 1/sqrt[ (c*Δt_p/L_p)^2 + 1] is approximately 1 + (-1/2)*((c*Δt_p/L_p)^2).
Yes.
and I see what you mean about the units. c = 1 light year/year by definition.
Right.
funny enough my calculator still gives me β = 1 with this approximation, but I definitely see how its not exactly equal to 1 now. I think its fine to simply say β = 0.99 right?

β is much closer to 1 than 0.99
Can you figure out how may 9's there are before you get some other digits?
 
TSny said:
Yes.
Right.β is much closer to 1 than 0.99
Can you figure out how may 9's there are before you get some other digits?
1 + (-1/2)*((c*Δt_p/L_p)^2) gives me 1 - 1.25 * 10^-11 after the subtraction is when my calculator gives me β =1 but id assume its more along the lines of β = 0.99999999999
 
Right, 1 - 1.25 * 10-11.

Put the calculator aside. You don't quite have the correct number of 9's and you should also be able to include a couple of the other digits beyond the last 9.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
Right, 1 - 1.25 * 10-11.

Put the calculator aside. You don't quite have the correct number of 9's and you should also be able to include a couple of the other digits beyond the last 9.
β = 0.9999999999875? I think I got it right this time
 
  • #11
Looks right. Good work! (Actually, I see now that your previous answer with eleven 9's is correct if you round off to the eleventh decimal place.)
 
  • #12
TSny said:
Looks right. Good work!
awesome! thank you very much, you were a great help :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K