Finding time average Poynting vector

Click For Summary
To find the time average of the Poynting vector (N'), given the electric (E) and magnetic (H) fields, one can use the relationship N = E x H. The equation N' = 0.5 * Re{F x I*} is not applicable if E and H are expressed in terms of their real components. Instead, calculating the RMS values of E and B allows for the determination of the average Poynting vector using formulas like S = E B / μ0 or S = E^2 / μ0 c. Time-averaging typically involves the square of sine or cosine functions, which introduces a factor of 0.5. Thus, the correct approach involves using RMS values and understanding the time-averaging process for non-constant fields.
kylie14
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Given E and H, obviously you can calculate Poynting vector (N=ExH), but then how do you find the time average of N (N')?

(I won't write all the question I'm trying to answer here but basically I'm trying the verify an equation, the says N' = 0.5* Re{ F x I* } where F and I are fields such that E= Re{F} and H=Re{H}. So obviously I can't use that equation. How else can I find N'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I memorized those things using B instead of H, but you can convert. Can you write the RMS values of the electric field and magnetic field? You will get the average of the poynting vector S (intensity, or energy per unit time per unit area) if you plug in the RMS values of E and B into any of these:

S = E B / mu0 = E^2 / mu0 c = c B^2 / mu0
 
Usually vector E and H are made up and constant (eg E0) multiplied by phase and time dependent parts. You must time average these non-constant parts of the equation. Often this comes down to time-averaging the square of sine/cosine, which gives a multiplicative factor of 0.5.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
845
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K