Finding Time If you know Accel, Vi and distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter student54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for an aircraft to travel down a 2.6-km runway under an acceleration of 42.5 m/s², starting from rest. The relevant equation used is d = vi(t) + (1/2)at², where vi is the initial velocity. The initial velocity (vi) is 0 m/s, simplifying the equation to d = (1/2)at². Participants clarified the correct application of the equation and addressed the common error of dividing by zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Basic knowledge of acceleration and distance
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation
  • Concept of initial velocity in motion equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive kinematic equations for different scenarios
  • Study the implications of initial conditions on motion equations
  • Explore advanced topics in physics such as projectile motion
  • Practice solving real-world problems using kinematic equations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion under constant acceleration.

student54321
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Some aircraft are capable of accelerations
of magnitude 42.5 m/s2. If an aircraft starts
from rest, how long will it take the aircraft
to travel down the 2.6-km runway?

Homework Equations


d= vi(t) - 1/2 a(t)2

I am assuming that you need to solve for t. I had trouble altering the equation to do that.

The Attempt at a Solution


since velocity initial is 0m/s, I keep getting divide by zero error, and I get a cube root.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF student54321,

Divide by zero error?

If vi = 0, then vit = 0, and the equation becomes:

d= 0 + (1/2)at2

Note that the second term should have a + sign, not a - sign, although typically 'a' also has an intrinsic sign depending on whether the acceleration is positive or negative.

This becomes:

d= (1/2)at2

Now can you solve for t?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K