Finding Time in Projectile Motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically determining the time a soccer ball is at a height of 2 meters after being kicked, given its horizontal range and time of flight.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of horizontal and vertical velocities based on the given range and time of flight. Questions arise about the interpretation of the equations used and the application of the quadratic formula for solving the resulting equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the calculations and questioning the methods used. Some guidance on using the quadratic formula has been offered, and there is a mix of interpretations regarding the problem setup and solution approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of the equations and the assumptions made in the problem, including the treatment of vertical and horizontal components of motion.

fcb
Messages
50
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A soccer ball is resting on a level football field is kicked, landing 20m away after 1.5 seconds. Neglecting the effects of spin and air resistance, Determine: The time when it was 2m above the ground

Homework Equations


Ux=13.333m
Uy=7.35m
t=?
(delta)y=2m
ay=-9.8ms-2

(delta)y=uyt + 0.5ayt2

The Attempt at a Solution



2=7.35t-4.9t2
t=5.35/4.9

EDIT: Upwards is taken to be +ve

~1.09

But that's not the answer in the book
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
Can you kindly explain how you obtained the horizontal and vertical velocity? Its seems that 20m is the range and the time of flight is 1.5s. Would the horizontal velocity be 3m/s? Please comment.
 
hi fcb! :wink:

fine down to here :smile:
fcb said:
2=7.35t-4.9t2
t=5.35/4.9

but you've spoiled it by reading it as if it was 2t on the left! :cry:
 
Would I have to use the quadratic formula to solve it?
 
(just got up :zzz: …)

Yup! :biggrin:
 
Ohh early start I would gather. Anyways, is the quadratic formula the only way it can be done?
 
It's not that i Don't like it, I was just curious to an extent. But when you rearrange it, why is it the one with t^2 the one that's represented as 'a' and the one with 't' alone represented as b in the equation for the quadratic formula. I know it is but why. I know nothing about maths or physics.
 
because ax2 + bx + c = a(x2 + bx/a + c/a)

= a((x + b/2a)2 - b2/4a2 + 4ac/a2),

so x + b/2a = ±√(b2 - 4ac)/2a :smile:
 
  • #10
Thanks so much tiny-tim, You're a absolute legend
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K