Finding v(t) for a velocity dependent force

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlehonda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an expression for velocity, v(t), given a one-dimensional retarding force that is dependent on velocity. The force is defined as F = -Ae^(-αv), where A and α are constants. Participants are exploring the integration of a velocity-dependent force within the context of classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of integrating a velocity-dependent force and whether to eliminate the velocity from the right-hand side during integration. Some attempt to use separable differential equations but express confusion about the results. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of constants and initial conditions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided hints and guidance on the integration process, with some clarifying the need to include mass in the differential equation. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of initial conditions and constants, with no explicit consensus reached on the final expression for v(t).

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific values for constants A and α, as well as an initial velocity v0, which are relevant to the problem but are not fully resolved in the discussion.

littlehonda
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the one-dimensional retarding force F=-Ae^(-[tex]\alpha[/tex]v) find an expression for v(t).


Homework Equations



F = m(dV/dt)
A and [tex]\alpha[/tex] are constants, v is instantaneous speed.

The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure how to frame the idea of integrating a velocity dependent force. Can I take simply integrate and use

v= -Ae^(-[tex]\alpha[/tex]v)t

or should the v be eliminated from the right hand side. I tried doing that by dividing the left by e^(-[tex]\alpha[/tex]v) and then doing a e^u du type integration but the answer i came up with didn't seem reasonable.

just looking for a little hint or push here, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: You have a separable differential equation for v(t):wink:
 
thanks for responding gabba,

I think that I tried the separable differential equations method but couldn't make sense of the answer

what i did was

e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v) dv = -Adt

1/[tex]\alpha[/tex](e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v)-e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v0)) = -At

i'm not sure what this means though or where to go from here
 
littlehonda said:
thanks for responding gabba,

I think that I tried the separable differential equations method but couldn't make sense of the answer

what i did was

e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v) dv = -Adt

1/[tex]\alpha[/tex](e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v)-e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v0)) = -At

i'm not sure what this means though or where to go from here

[tex]\int e^{\alpha v}dv =\frac{e^{\alpha v}}{\alpha}+C_1[/tex]

And

[tex]\int-Adt=-At+C_2[/tex]

[tex]\implies \frac{e^{\alpha v}}{\alpha}=-At+C_3[/tex] where [itex]C_3 \equiv C_1-C_2[/itex]

Multiply both sides of the equation by [itex]\alpha[/itex] and then take the natural log. What initial conditions are you given?
 
ok so that's where I got to pretty much, the C1+C2=C3 makes sense.

Here is all the information given

A= 1/m/s^2
[tex]\alpha[/tex]=.1 s/m
v0= 20 m/s
 
I assume [itex]v_0=v(t=0)[/itex]? If so, you can solve for [itex]C_3[/itex].
 
littlehonda said:

Homework Statement



Given the one-dimensional retarding force F=-Ae^(-[tex]\alpha[/tex]v) find an expression for v(t).


Homework Equations



F = m(dV/dt)
A and [tex]\alpha[/tex] are constants, v is instantaneous speed.

The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure how to frame the idea of integrating a velocity dependent force. Can I take simply integrate and use

v= -Ae^(-[tex]\alpha[/tex]v)t

or should the v be eliminated from the right hand side. I tried doing that by dividing the left by e^(-[tex]\alpha[/tex]v) and then doing a e^u du type integration but the answer i came up with didn't seem reasonable.

just looking for a little hint or push here, thanks!

littlehonda said:
thanks for responding gabba,

I think that I tried the separable differential equations method but couldn't make sense of the answer

what i did was

e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v) dv = -Adt

1/[tex]\alpha[/tex](e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v)-e^([tex]\alpha[/tex]v0)) = -At

i'm not sure what this means though or where to go from here
Your original equation is
[tex]m\frac{dv}{dt}= -Ae^{-\alpha t}[/itex]<br /> which separates as <br /> [tex]e^{\alpha v}dv= -A/m dt[/tex]<br /> (you dropped the "m")<br /> Integrating,<br /> [tex]-\frac{1}{\alpha}e^{\alpha v}+ C= -(A/m)t[/tex]<br /> Assuming that your [itex]v_0[/itex] is the velocity when t= 0, <br /> [tex]-\frac{1}{\alpha}e^{\alpha v_0}+ C= 0[/tex] <br /> so <br /> [tex]C= \frac{1}{\alpha}e^{\alpha v_0}[/tex]<br /> so <br /> [tex]-\frac{1}{\alpha}\left(e^{\alpha v}- e^{\alpha v_0}\right)= -(A/m)t[/tex]<br /> which is just what you have (except for the "m").<br /> <br /> Are you concerned with solving for v?<br /> [tex]e^{\alpha v}- e^{\alpha v_0}= (A\alpha/m)t[/tex]<br /> [tex]e^{\alpha v}= (A\alpha/m)t+ e^{\alpha v_0}[/tex]<br /> Now take the logarithm of both sides.[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[itex]v_0=v(t=0)[/itex]

(e^20[itex]\alpha[/itex])/[itex]\alpha[/itex] = C3

C3 = 73.8

v(t) = (ln(-At[itex]\alpha[/itex])+ ln(73.8[itex]\alpha[/itex]))/[tex]alpha[/tex]

sorry if I am a little slow with this, am I making an error here?
 
littlehonda said:
[itex]v_0=v(t=0)[/itex]

(e^20[itex]\alpha[/itex])/[itex]\alpha[/itex] = C3

C3 = 73.8

v(t) = (ln(-At[itex]\alpha[/itex])+ ln(73.8[itex]\alpha[/itex]))/[tex]alpha[/tex]

sorry if I am a little slow with this, am I making an error here?

Yes, you are making a few errors.

To start with, Halls pointed out that you dropped the mass of the object from the differential equation...when you include it, you should get

[tex]\frac{me^{\alpha v}}{\alpha}=-At+C_3[/tex]

Multiply both sides of the equation by alpha/m:

[tex]\implies e^{\alpha v}=\frac{\alpha}{m}(-At+C_3)[/tex]

Then take the natural log of both sides

[tex]\alpha v =\ln\left(\frac{\alpha}{m}(-At+C_3)\right)[/tex]

You can take it from there...
 
  • #10
I was careless putting the force equation up, the right side of the equation also contains a m to cancel the one on the left.
 
  • #11
v= (ln([itex]\alpha[/itex](-At+C3)))/[itex]\alpha[/itex]

Solving for C3

C3 = (e^v0[itex]\alpha[/itex])/[itex]\alpha[/itex]

at V(0) t=0

C3 = 73.89


v= (ln([itex]\alpha[/itex](-At+73.89)))/[itex]\alpha[/itex]
 
  • #12
Looks good to me :approve:
 
  • #13
hey thanks a lot both of you guys!

hate to keep pestering but if I want to find x(t) I just integrate dx/dt and find a new constant C3 using the initial condition x(0) t=0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
29K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K