Finite Element Method: Linear vs. Quadratic Elements & DOF

Click For Summary
Linear elements have three nodes with two degrees of freedom (DOFs) each, totaling six DOFs, while quadratic elements include additional mid-nodes that allow for bending. The discussion highlights the incompatibility between linear and quadratic elements when placed adjacent to each other, complicating the visualization of their interaction. The performance of different element types is also examined, noting that 4-node tetrahedral elements yield only half the deflection compared to 10-node tetrahedral elements under the same load, leading to conservative results. Additionally, the stiffness of lower-order tetrahedral elements results in modal frequencies that are approximately 40% higher than those of higher-order elements. This discrepancy can significantly affect the analysis of operating ranges and lead to potentially unconservative conclusions.
Engineer_s
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Linear and quadratic elements differ because of the extra mid-nodes on quadratic elements. Quadratic elements can "bend", linear can't. How do you define the DOF of a element? (see at solution attempt)

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


For example: a linear triangle has 3 nodes. Each node has 2 DOFs (x and y). The total field variable will have 3 x 2 = 6 DOFs? Why does this element don't have 3 DOFs per node? (2 translations + rotation)

Wat is the problem with following elements, why is this not possible? What with a quadratic and linear element adjacent to each other. This is not compatible, how can this be visualized?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the hex elements along with the 10-node tetras get close to the solution and provide conservative results. The 4-node tetras, however, which are actually degenerate 8-node hex elements because ANSYS removed their 4-node tetra elements along time ago, show only half the deflection under the same load. The extra stiffness also causes the modal frequencies to be higher. In this case, the frequencies of the low-order tetras were about 40% higher than the high-order tetras. When you’re looking at operating ranges, this could also lead to unconservative conclusions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K