Problem in finite element method using direct stiffness method

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a finite element method problem from Logan's textbook, specifically using the direct stiffness method. The user derived the stiffness matrix and applied boundary conditions but encountered confusion regarding the assumption that the force at the third node (F3x) is zero. It is clarified that F3x is indeed zero because the only applied force is at node 4 (F4x = 5000 lb), which leads to no reaction force at the third node due to the absence of external loads acting on it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite element method principles
  • Familiarity with direct stiffness method
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in structural analysis
  • Basic concepts of force equilibrium in static systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of stiffness matrices in finite element analysis
  • Learn about boundary condition applications in structural problems
  • Explore reaction forces and equilibrium in static systems
  • Review examples of finite element method problems in Logan's textbook
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focusing on structural analysis and finite element methods, will benefit from this discussion.

chiraganand
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi,

This is a sample problem from logan finite element method. I have attached the problem and solution given in the book. As per the problem i first derived the stiffness matrix and den putting the boundary conditions started solving for the forces. I am stuck as three forces are unknown but when i checked the book it says the force at third node is zero. Can someone tell me why this force is assumed as zero?
 

Attachments

  • sample problem.jpg
    sample problem.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 532
Physics news on Phys.org
F3x = 0 since only one applied force is present in the problem at node 4. So F4x = 5000 lb.
 
rock.freak667 said:
F3x = 0 since only one applied force is present in the problem at node 4. So F4x = 5000 lb.
But shudnt there be a reaction at 3rd node
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K