Finite Element Method: Linear vs. Quadratic Elements & DOF

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Linear and quadratic elements in finite element analysis differ primarily due to the presence of mid-nodes in quadratic elements, allowing them to bend, unlike linear elements. A linear triangle has 3 nodes, each with 2 degrees of freedom (DOFs), resulting in a total of 6 DOFs. The discussion highlights the incompatibility of adjacent linear and quadratic elements and the implications of using different element types, particularly in ANSYS, where 4-node tetras exhibit reduced deflection and higher modal frequencies compared to 10-node tetras. This discrepancy can lead to unconservative results in operational ranges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite element analysis (FEA)
  • Familiarity with degrees of freedom (DOF) in structural elements
  • Knowledge of ANSYS software and its element types
  • Basic concepts of modal analysis and stiffness in structural mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between linear and quadratic finite elements in detail
  • Learn about the implementation of mid-nodes in finite element modeling
  • Explore the effects of element type on modal frequencies in ANSYS
  • Study the compatibility issues between adjacent finite element types
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, finite element analysts, and students studying structural mechanics who are interested in understanding the implications of element selection in finite element modeling and analysis.

Engineer_s
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Linear and quadratic elements differ because of the extra mid-nodes on quadratic elements. Quadratic elements can "bend", linear can't. How do you define the DOF of a element? (see at solution attempt)

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


For example: a linear triangle has 3 nodes. Each node has 2 DOFs (x and y). The total field variable will have 3 x 2 = 6 DOFs? Why does this element don't have 3 DOFs per node? (2 translations + rotation)

Wat is the problem with following elements, why is this not possible? What with a quadratic and linear element adjacent to each other. This is not compatible, how can this be visualized?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the hex elements along with the 10-node tetras get close to the solution and provide conservative results. The 4-node tetras, however, which are actually degenerate 8-node hex elements because ANSYS removed their 4-node tetra elements along time ago, show only half the deflection under the same load. The extra stiffness also causes the modal frequencies to be higher. In this case, the frequencies of the low-order tetras were about 40% higher than the high-order tetras. When you’re looking at operating ranges, this could also lead to unconservative conclusions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K