Fire Truck Problem: Inertia, Effect & More

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Taturana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Truck
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a fire truck's water tank during braking, specifically how the water's inertia and movement affect the truck's stopping behavior. Participants explore various scenarios based on the tank's fill level (half-full, full, and 90% full) and consider concepts such as inertia, momentum, and fluid dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that when the tank is half-full, the water's inertia will push the truck forward when slowing down, while a full tank behaves more like a solid.
  • Another participant argues that inertia itself does not push anything forward, emphasizing that it is the reluctance of an object to change its state of motion.
  • The same participant describes the dynamics of the water in a half-full tank, noting that waves will form and the truck may rock back and forth due to forced oscillation.
  • In the case of a full tank, it is noted that no wave formation occurs, leading to smoother stopping motion, but the larger mass of water results in longer braking distances.
  • For a tank that is 90% full, the discussion highlights two scenarios: one where the truck moves slowly and experiences wave formation similar to the half-full case, and another where the truck moves quickly, leading to more erratic water motion and increased complexity in behavior.
  • One participant mentions the "free surface effect" as a relevant concept, suggesting it may relate to the water sloshing in the tank.
  • Another participant speculates that the tank would likely have baffles to mitigate the sloshing of water.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of water movement in the tank, with some emphasizing the role of inertia and wave formation, while others challenge these interpretations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific impacts of varying water levels on the truck's braking dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of additional context, such as the dimensions of the tank and the mass of water, which are not provided. This lack of information complicates comparisons between the different fill levels.

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Suppose a fire truck, with a huge tank of water. If the tank is half-full, when you slow down the water's inertia is going to push the truck forward. When it's full, the water can be thought like a solid, so it doesn't have the same effect.

The question is: what are the concepts involved in this problem? If the tank is, say, 90% filled, is it going to have more or less effect than when it's half-full (by "effect" I mean, how the water movement will affect the truck brake).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, inertia will not push anything forward or in anyway. You must understand that inertia is the 'reluctance of an object to change in its state of motion or rest' which is derived from Newton's First Law of Motion.

To visit the problem of the Firetruck, you must look at it at many angles, namely: Inertia, Momentum, Newton's Laws of Motion and Wave.

It is important that you isolate the system under investigation for motion which is the tank with water itself (Presumably in rectangular prism shape).




1) In the 1st case (50% full)


When the tank comes to a stop, the water will decelerate an the force it applies to the front wall of the tank will be equal to the rate of change in momentum.

Now, water waves will be formed due to the forward motion of the water at the back of the tank due to inertia; and the force the water tank applies to the water body due to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This will create the 'motion'.

At the same time, if you look at the truck stopping motion, you will expect to see it rocks back and forth (even though you are unlikely to see it due to dampers) when it comes to a completes stop because of forced oscillation (in this case, the driving force comes from the periodic waves of the water body).



2) In the 2nd case (full)

What you have mentioned is not wrong, the water body and the tank is taken to be a solid. As such, no wave formation is possible. It's important for you to remember that liquid is incompressible so no longitudinal wave is possible.

As a result, the truck stopping motion would be smooth and no 'jerkiness'. There is also another difference in the stopping motion. Due to the larger mass of the water, the momentum of the truck will be much larger. As such, given the same braking force, the duration of braking and distance of braking will be longer (related to Momentum).



3) In the last case (90%)

This is tricky for comparison as no values of motion, dimension of the tank or mass is given for context.

Why this information is important because there are 2 possible situations:

A. The truck moves slowly and brakes.

Given the small initial momentum and small inertia, the water body will form waves and the observations are very similar to the 1st case, albeit more vigorous due to larger momentum.

B. The truck moves very fast and brakes.

In this case, the initial momentum and inertia are huge. As such, the water ripples are large. This is when the problems come in. Firstly, the dimension of the tank will impede such motion. This will result in forces acting in different directions, other than the horizontal direction. The truck will become more 'shaky'. Due to these impediment, the motion of the water also becomes more erratic and unpredictable (relate to Fluid Mechanics).

I would say the 'motion' is more because of 2 reasons:
- The huge initial Kinetic Energy causes the water body to move around more vigorously and for a longer time
- The movement of the water is much more complex.

I hope this answers your question :)
 
Nguyen Quang said:
Firstly, inertia will not push anything forward or in anyway. You must understand that inertia is the 'reluctance of an object to change in its state of motion or rest' which is derived from Newton's First Law of Motion.

To visit the problem of the Firetruck, you must look at it at many angles, namely: Inertia, Momentum, Newton's Laws of Motion and Wave.

It is important that you isolate the system under investigation for motion which is the tank with water itself (Presumably in rectangular prism shape).




1) In the 1st case (50% full)


When the tank comes to a stop, the water will decelerate an the force it applies to the front wall of the tank will be equal to the rate of change in momentum.

Now, water waves will be formed due to the forward motion of the water at the back of the tank due to inertia; and the force the water tank applies to the water body due to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This will create the 'motion'.

At the same time, if you look at the truck stopping motion, you will expect to see it rocks back and forth (even though you are unlikely to see it due to dampers) when it comes to a completes stop because of forced oscillation (in this case, the driving force comes from the periodic waves of the water body).



2) In the 2nd case (full)

What you have mentioned is not wrong, the water body and the tank is taken to be a solid. As such, no wave formation is possible. It's important for you to remember that liquid is incompressible so no longitudinal wave is possible.

As a result, the truck stopping motion would be smooth and no 'jerkiness'. There is also another difference in the stopping motion. Due to the larger mass of the water, the momentum of the truck will be much larger. As such, given the same braking force, the duration of braking and distance of braking will be longer (related to Momentum).



3) In the last case (90%)

This is tricky for comparison as no values of motion, dimension of the tank or mass is given for context.

Why this information is important because there are 2 possible situations:

A. The truck moves slowly and brakes.

Given the small initial momentum and small inertia, the water body will form waves and the observations are very similar to the 1st case, albeit more vigorous due to larger momentum.

B. The truck moves very fast and brakes.

In this case, the initial momentum and inertia are huge. As such, the water ripples are large. This is when the problems come in. Firstly, the dimension of the tank will impede such motion. This will result in forces acting in different directions, other than the horizontal direction. The truck will become more 'shaky'. Due to these impediment, the motion of the water also becomes more erratic and unpredictable (relate to Fluid Mechanics).

I would say the 'motion' is more because of 2 reasons:
- The huge initial Kinetic Energy causes the water body to move around more vigorously and for a longer time
- The movement of the water is much more complex.

I hope this answers your question :)

This helped. Thank you very much.
 
Google Free surface effect.
 
I think the OP was talking about the water sloshing around in the tank. I would think the tank would have baffles to prevent this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K