Firing Cannon to Start Avalanche: Angle Calculation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the angle at which a cannon should be fired to start an avalanche, given specific horizontal and vertical distances and the cannon's muzzle speed. The context is rooted in projectile motion and the application of kinematic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using a system of equations to relate the horizontal and vertical motions of the cannonball. There is exploration of trigonometric identities and the formulation of a quadratic equation in terms of tangent to find the angle.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on manipulating the equations and have confirmed the validity of using the quadratic formula to solve for the angle. The discussion is progressing with attempts to simplify and solve the equations, though no consensus on the final solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of projectile motion equations and are considering the implications of plugging in numerical values at different stages of their calculations.

deezy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cannon has a muzzle speed of 1000 m/s, and it is used to start an avalanche on a mountain 1000 m from the cannon horizontally and 500 m above the cannon. What angle above the horizontal should the cannon be fired?

v_0 = 1000 m/s
y_t = 500 m
x_t = 1000 m

Homework Equations


x_t = x_0 + v_0 cos \theta t
y_t = y_0 + v_0 sin \theta t - g t^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know if this approach is right but I tried a system of equations:

1000 = 1000 cos \theta t
1 = cos \theta t
t = \frac{1}{cos \theta}

I tried substituting t from the first equation into this one:
500 = 1000 sin \theta t - (1/2)(9.81)t^2
500 = 1000 sin \theta t - (1/2)(9.81)t^2
500 = 1000 \frac {sin \theta }{cos \theta} - \frac{(4.905)}{cos ^2 \theta}
500 = 1000 tan \theta - (4.905)sec \theta

But I didn't know how to solve for theta. Is this the right approach, or is there an easier way to do this problem?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should get in the habit of plugging numbers in only near the end. Using a trig identity, you get:
\begin{align*}
y_t &= x_t \tan\theta - x_t^2\left(\frac{g}{2v_0^2}\right)\sec^2 \theta \\
&= x_t \tan\theta - x_t^2\left(\frac{g}{2v_0^2}\right)(1+\tan^2 \theta)
\end{align*}
That's quadratic in tan θ. (I'd plug the numbers in now.) Can you take it from here?
 
Plugging in from that point I got:

500 = 1000 tan \theta - \frac {1000^2}{2*1000^2}*9.81(1+tan^2 \theta)

Which simplified to:

tan^2 \theta - 203.874 tan \theta + 102.937 = 0

I get stuck here. Not sure how to solve this... my idea was let x = tan \theta and solve x using the quadratic formula, then plug tan \theta back in for x to find the angle. Does this work?
 
Yes, that'll work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
962
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K