First order ordinary differential equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
KillerZ
Messages
116
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I haven't done ODEs in a few years and I am trying to do this equation:

[itex]m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}\frac{dT_{Hg}}{dt} = Q[/itex]

[itex]Q = hA(T_{air} - T_{Hg})[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg}(t = 0) = 20[/itex]

I need to find [itex]T_{Hg}(t=590)[/itex]

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]h, A, m_{Hg}, C_{p,Hg}, T_{air}[/itex] are all constants

[itex]\frac{dT_{Hg}}{dt} = \frac{hA(T_{air} - T_{Hg})}{m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA(T_{air} - T_{Hg})} dT_{Hg} = dt[/itex]

[itex]\int\frac{m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA(T_{air} - T_{Hg})} dT_{Hg} = \int dt[/itex]

[itex]\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}\int\frac{1}{(-T_{air} + T_{Hg})} dT_{Hg} = \int dt[/itex]

[itex]\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA} ln|T_{Hg} - T_{air}| = t + c[/itex]

[itex]ln|T_{Hg} - T_{air}| = \frac{t + c}{\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}}[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg} - T_{air} = e^{t/\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}}e^{c/\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}}[/itex]

[itex]e^{c/\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}} = c[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg} - T_{air} = ce^{t/\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}}[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg} = ce^{t/\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}} + T_{air}[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg}(t = 0) = 20[/itex]

[itex]T_{air} = -7[/itex]

[itex]h = 3.9[/itex]

[itex]A = 0.00176[/itex]

[itex]C_{p,HG} = 139.0908[/itex]

[itex]m_{Hg} = 0.05[/itex]

[itex]20 = ce^{0/\frac{-(0.05)(139.0908)}{(3.9)(0.00176)}} + (-7)[/itex]

[itex]c = 27[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg} = 27e^{t/\frac{-m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}{hA}} + T_{air}[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg}(t=590)[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg}(t=590) = 27e^{590/\frac{-(0.05)(139.0908)}{(3.9)(0.00176)}} + (-7)[/itex]

[itex]T_{Hg}(t=590) = 8.0822[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Man, you must like typing subscripts. Why not call your dependent variable T and write the equation in the form

[tex]\frac{dT}{dt} = k(T_a - T)[/tex]

in the first place and put the constants in for k at the end? It would be much easier to read, not to mention typing it all in. Anyway, it looks like you solved it OK, with the caveat that I didn't check all the details.
 
I think you made an error in using your initial condition (using the notation of LCKurtz) you had:
[tex] -\ln |T_{a}-T|=kt+c[/tex]
Now if [itex]T(0)=T_{0}[/itex], then I would use that at this point here to tell you that [itex]-\ln |T_{a}-T_{0}|=c[/itex] and your equation becomes:
[tex] -\ln |T_{a}-T|=kt-\ln |T_{a}-T_{0}|[/tex]
From here I think it is just algebra to obtain the correct answer.
 
LCKurtz said:
Man, you must like typing subscripts. Why not call your dependent variable T and write the equation in the form

[tex]\frac{dT}{dt} = k(T_a - T)[/tex]

in the first place and put the constants in for k at the end? It would be much easier to read, not to mention typing it all in. Anyway, it looks like you solved it OK, with the caveat that I didn't check all the details.

OK doing it with the substitutions:

[itex]k = \frac{hA}{m_{Hg}C_{p,Hg}}[/itex]

and

[itex]T = T_{Hg}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{dT}{dt} = k(T_a - T)[/itex]

[itex]\frac{1}{k(T_a - T)}dT = dt[/itex]

[itex]\frac{-1}{k}\int\frac{1}{(-T_a + T)}dT = \int dt[/itex]

[itex]\frac{-1}{k}ln|-T_a + T| = t + c[/itex]

[itex]ln|-T_a + T| = -kt + c[/itex]

[itex]-T_a + T = e^{-kt + c}[/itex]

[itex]T = ce^{-kt} + T_a[/itex]

Then initial conditions T(t=0) = 20

[itex]20 = ce^{-k(0)} + (-7)[/itex]

[itex]27 = c[/itex]

[itex]T = 27e^{-kt} + T_a[/itex]
 
Last edited: