Heat transfer in a nuclear reactor and the electrical equivalent

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the heat transfer processes in a nuclear reactor, particularly focusing on the equations governing temperature changes in the fuel, graphite, and coolant. Participants explore the relationship between thermal resistance and electrical analogs, considering both steady-state and transient conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents equations for heat transfer in the fuel, graphite, and coolant, expressing uncertainty about the last equation for the coolant.
  • Another participant suggests using a triangular control boundary to simplify the equations, noting the symmetry and drawing parallels between temperature and voltage, as well as heat flux and current.
  • A later reply confirms the simplification of equations using the triangular boundary but questions whether the initial approach was incorrect, suggesting that both methods should yield the same result.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of steady-state conditions, with one participant stating that temperature gradients and heat flux should be constant, and that heat leaving the fuel must equal heat entering the coolant channel.
  • Another participant expresses interest in understanding the general case of the system, including the role of capacitors in the electrical equivalent model, while acknowledging the complexity it may introduce.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of steady-state conditions and the relationships between the components, but there is no consensus on the correctness of the initial equations or the treatment of the electrical analogs, indicating multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions regarding steady-state conditions, the dependence on the chosen control volume, and unresolved details regarding the integration of capacitors in the electrical model.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in thermal dynamics in nuclear reactors, electrical analogs of thermal systems, and those studying heat transfer principles in engineering contexts may find this discussion relevant.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Homework Statement
see picture below
Relevant Equations
heat transfer equation
Schermata 2019-06-15 alle 19.51.41.png

To write the equation I took as the control volume the following block:
Schermata 2019-06-15 alle 19.56.31.png

and the equation I wrote are:

$$ 6m_{f} c_{p_{f}} \frac {dT_{f}}{dt} = 6P - \frac 1 {R_1} (T_f - T_g) \text{ for the fuel}$$
$$ m_{g} c_{p_g} \frac {dT_{g}}{dt} = \frac 1 {R_1} (T_f - T_g) - \frac 1 {R_2} (T_g - T_c) \text{ for the graphite}$$
$$ 3m_{c} c_{p_c} \frac {dT_{c}}{dt} = \frac 1 {R_1} (T_g - T_c) - 3G c_{p_{c}} (T_{out} - T_{in}) \text{ for the coolant}$$

##P## is the power produced by each fuel element. In stationary condition just drop the time derivative. I'm not totally sure about the last one though...

I have no clue on point b). Can someone give me a hint ?

Thanks Ric
 

Attachments

  • 228297-bb4839921d2956f8b0a1b63183a9e3ba.png
    228297-bb4839921d2956f8b0a1b63183a9e3ba.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 265
  • 228298-f79e368bf357c51169ccbcab20957e6a.png
    228298-f79e368bf357c51169ccbcab20957e6a.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 237
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing a triangular control boundary from the center of the central coolant channel to the center of two outer coolant channels, which has a fuel element in the middle. See the symmetry. The temperature is like the voltage, heat flux like the current through the fuel and graphite into the coolant. There are thermal resistances.
 
Astronuc said:
Try drawing a triangular control boundary
If I take the triangular boundary the equations become:
$$ m_{f} c_{p_{f}} \frac {dT_{f}}{dt} = P - \frac 1 {R_1} (T_f - T_g) \text{ for the fuel}$$
$$ m_{g} c_{p_g} \frac {dT_{g}}{dt} = \frac 1 {R_1} (T_f - T_g) - \frac 1 {R_2} (T_g - T_c) \text{ for the graphite}$$
$$ m_{c} c_{p_c} \frac {dT_{c}}{dt} = \frac 1 {R_1} (T_g - T_c) - G c_{p_{c}} (T_{out} - T_{in}) \text{ for the coolant}$$
They are simpler (thanks for the suggestion :smile: ), but I don't think that my first try was wrong. In fact the mass of moderator inside the boundary in this case is less than what I considered in the previous post. At the end they should give the same result, correct ?
Astronuc said:
There are thermal resistances.
If the system is stationary I think I did it. I can re-arrange the last equation imposing ##T_{c} = \frac {T_{in} + T_{out}} 2## :

$$m_c c_{p_c} \frac {dT_c}{dt} = \frac 1 {R_1} (T_g - T_c) - 2G c_{p_{c}} (T_c - T_{in})$$

And the equivalent electrical network should be:
photo_2019-06-15 21.02.37.jpeg


But in the general case there should be capacitors (the terms with ##mc_p \frac{dT}{dt}##) and I don't know how to insert them properly inside the circuit. Maybe in parallel with the corresponding resistance ?
 
Since part a states "steady-state", then dT/dt = 0. The temperature gradients and heat flux should be constant. The heat leaving the fuel must equal the heat entering the coolant channel.
 
Yes but I'd like to know the general case too, if it doesn't get too complicated. Anyway Thanks for the replies!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
15K