Fixing Normalization Issues in Graphing Orthonormalized Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter scigal89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on addressing normalization issues in graphing orthonormalized functions, specifically the functions ψ₁ and ψ₂ derived from the integral of e^{ik(x-X)}. The user encounters a problem with a dip at zero in ψ₂, attributed to improper normalization. The teacher recommends using the Gram-Schmidt process for normalization, but the user reports difficulties achieving correct results. The user applies Gram-Schmidt over the interval (0, 2π) but ends up with unsatisfactory outputs, indicating a need for further clarification on the procedure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, particularly Fourier transforms.
  • Familiarity with the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process.
  • Knowledge of sine functions and their properties in mathematical analysis.
  • Experience with graphing functions and interpreting their behavior.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process in detail, focusing on its application to sine functions.
  • Investigate the properties of the sinc function and its role in normalization.
  • Explore numerical methods for function normalization and their implementation in software tools.
  • Learn about alternative normalization techniques that may simplify the process for complex functions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in signal processing or function analysis who seeks to understand and resolve normalization issues in orthonormalized functions.

scigal89
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
In class we worked out the following

<br /> <br /> \int e^{ik(x-X)}dk=\frac{e^{ik(x-X)}}{i(x-X)}\approx \frac{sin[k(x-X)]}{x-X}<br /> <br />

by taking the real part of the solution. My teacher wants us to graph the following functions

<br /> <br /> \psi_{1} \sim \frac{sin(x)}{x}<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> \psi_{2} \sim \frac{sin(x)}{x}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{sin(2x)}{2x}<br /> <br />

The second function, though, has a little dip in it at 0 that shouldn't be there. He says that's due to the fact that the functions aren't normalized and that we should be doing Gram-Scmidt or some other procedure to obtain the proper results. However, when I do Gram-Schmidt I get something nasty that can't possibly be correct (and most importantly, doesn't correct the problem). So what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For Gram-Schmidt I take interval as (0, 2π). Then

<br /> <br /> \phi _{0} = \frac{sin(x)}{x\sqrt {Si(4 \pi)}}<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> \psi _{1} = \left \{ \frac{sin(x)}{x}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{sin(2x)}{(2x)}\right \}-\left [ \int_{0}^{2\pi}\left \{ \frac{sin(x)}{x}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{sin(2x)}{(2x)}\right \}\frac{sin(x)}{x\sqrt {Si(4 \pi)}}dx \right ]\frac{sin(x)}{x\sqrt {Si(4 \pi)}}<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> \psi _{1} \sim \frac{0.2627sin(x)}{x}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{sin(2x)}{2x}<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> \phi _{1} \sim 3.3631\left \{ \frac{0.2627sin(x)}{x}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{sin(2x)}{2x} \right \}<br /> <br />

using the procedure for Gram-Schmidt outlined here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Gram-SchmidtOrthonormalization.html

and with a weighting function of 1.
 
Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K