Fizeau's Experiment (Speed of light)

In summary, the conversation discusses the Fizeau's Experiment to determine the speed of light using a rotating gear with N teeth, a frequency of f, and a distance of L between the gear and the mirror. The conversation also mentions the use of equations such as speed = distance/time, f = 1/T, and angular frequency(w) = 2πf to solve for the speed of light. Different approaches and solutions are discussed, with the final solution including a term for n eclipses. The significance of n in this experiment is to maintain the series and account for the rotation speed where the light cannot return through a gap.
  • #1
TachyonLord
54
6

Homework Statement



In the Fizeau's Experiment to determine the speed of light, let the gear have N teeth, the frequency of the rotating gear being f, the distance traveled by the light beam/ray L (distance b/w the gear and the mirror) and let there be n eclipses(blocking of the light beam).
Calculate the speed of light.
More information on the experiment :
1.png

Homework Equations


$$Speed =\frac {Distance} {Time}$$
$$ f = \frac 1 T$$
Angular frequency(w) = 2πf

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried solving this by using $$c(speed of light) = \frac {2L} t$$
where T will be the time for the light to pass through the teeth and then be reflected.If T is the time period of the gear, then $$t = \frac T {2N}$$
because I'm thinking that the time for one eclipse should be the time taken to go from A to B, which is equivalent to one tooth's length.
Untitled.png

$$⇒ t = \frac {1} {2fN}$$
And subsequently, c = 4LfN , but this doesn't include n.
So I tried a different approach and used the formula $$t = \frac d v$$
$$d = \frac {2πR} {2N}$$
v = (2πf)R
which again gives the same answer, without the n term.

I also thought of another situation, where the light goes through the gap and is blocked by some tooth(which is not the successive one) which seems absurd in itself and I don't really know how to continue.
The answer that was annouced in the class had something like (2n-1) in the denominator. I don't know where I'm going wrong.
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    10.9 KB · Views: 1,005
  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 804
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
TachyonLord said:
because I'm thinking that the time for one eclipse should be the time taken to go from A to B, which is equivalent to one tooth's length.
It is 1/(2N) of one revolution in the first case (n=1), 3/(2N) of one revolution in the second case (n=2) and so on. Can you generalize this?
 
  • Like
Likes TachyonLord
  • #3
mfb said:
It is 1/(2N) of one revolution in the first case (n=1), 3/(2N) of one revolution in the second case (n=2) and so on. Can you generalize this?
How does it become 3/(2N) for n=2 ? Could you explain ?
 
  • #4
Gap to gap is 1/N, but you have 3/2 of that distance.
 
  • Like
Likes TachyonLord
  • #5
mfb said:
Gap to gap is 1/N, but you have 3/2 of that distance.
Thank you so much ! After generalising, I'm getting $$\frac {4LNf} {2n-1}$$
Although I'm yet to confirm is this is the answer, but this is what I get. Again, thank you so much !
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #6
mfb said:
It is 1/(2N) of one revolution in the first case (n=1), 3/(2N) of one revolution in the second case (n=2) and so on. Can you generalize this?
Okay just a teeny doubt, how do you define an eclipse ? I mean I used n in order to maintain the series but like what would be its physical significance ?
 
  • #7
It is a rotation speed where the light can't return through a gap.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
933
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top