Hello!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I hear an elementary particle course and I wonder about one question: There is the multiplett of [tex]\pi^+, \pi^0, \pi^-[/tex]. It is said that all have Isospin 1 and [tex]I_z = -1,0,1[/tex]. So far so good. So these particles are to form a two-dimensional irreducible representation of SU(2). They are composed of a quark and an antiquark in the form:

[tex]\pi^+ : u\bar d[/tex]

[tex]\pi^0 : u\bar u - d\bar d[/tex]

[tex]\pi^- : d\bar u[/tex]

So, this should be the I = 1 part of [tex]\frac{1}{2}\otimes\frac{1}{2} = 0\oplus 1[/tex]. But on p. 26 my Maggiore says that these states are given as above but with a plus sign! The one with the minus sign is said to be the scalar representation.

So where is the mistake if there is any? I also can't see why the state with a minus should be a scalar representation. Hope somebody can help me out of confusion.

Thanks!

Blue2script

PS: By the way, maybe someone can also explain me the deeper meaning and use of the hypercharge. Up to now for me its only a definition used in representing multipletts in Young diagrams...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Flavour-SU(2) for Pion-Multiplett

Loading...

Similar Threads for Flavour Pion Multiplett | Date |
---|---|

A I need a spherically symmetric spin-dependent NN potential | Mar 10, 2018 |

A Flavour neutrino masses | Oct 26, 2016 |

A Minimal Flavour Violation | Oct 1, 2016 |

A Transforming lepton basis to diagonlise charged lepton mass | Sep 4, 2016 |

B Flavour changing neutrinos and relevance to big bang | Jul 12, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**