Fluid Dynamics and the Francis Formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Francis formula for calculating the flow rate of water over a weir, specifically in scenarios where water cascades down a surface rather than flowing freely. Preet highlights concerns regarding the accuracy of the formula when the water clings to the surface, which is not typical for standard weir applications. The conversation also references the book "Hydraulics and its Applications" by A.H. Gibson as a valuable resource for understanding these specific flow conditions. The need for clarity on the threshold for safe application of the Francis formula in non-standard scenarios is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Francis formula for flow rate calculations
  • Knowledge of weir design and flow dynamics
  • Familiarity with hydraulic principles and head measurement
  • Basic grasp of fluid mechanics concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the limitations of the Francis formula in non-standard flow conditions
  • Explore alternative formulas for flow rate calculations in clinging nape scenarios
  • Study the principles of hydraulic jumps and their effects on flow rate
  • Read "Hydraulics and its Applications" by A.H. Gibson for detailed insights
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, hydrologists, and researchers involved in fluid dynamics, particularly those focused on weir design and flow rate calculations in non-standard applications.

preet
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Hey all...

I'm trying to write a technical report and one part involves calculating the rate of flow of water through a straight horizontal weir. Searching on the web has led me to the Francis formula, which seems to be pretty straightforward. The problem I have is that my specific application has a much lower head (height of water) then used in any of the sample problems and on the net with the Francis formula. In addition, the Francis formula seems to apply to water flowing over a weir, in almost waterfall like fashion. For my purposes, the water will cascade down a surface... I don't know if this will affect the flow rate, or if I can use the formula in my situation.

So basically, I want to know if there is a threshold that is "safe", in which I would be okay using the formula (getting reasonable values). I would really appreciate all the information I could get on the Francis formula (and any other ones that apply).

Thanks,
Preet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry for bumping my post up so quickly, but I don't think I really explained what I was looking for properly...

Normal applications of weirs tend to require that the water that escapes from the weir does not cling to the surface (as seen in 1. [attached]):

My application requires they DO cling to the surface (as seen in 2.). Unfortunately I cannot find any information on how to calculate flow rate with a clinging nape since in general that is a situation that would be avoided.

In addition, I see a few different versions of the "Francis formula" which is the most common method I see being used to calculate flow rate from weirs, and I've read specifically that a clinging nape distorts the accuracy of the results heavily.

The formula I'm looking for is a relation between the Width of the weir, Head (height) of water on top of weir plate, and Flow Rate of water.

I'm having a lot of trouble finding good relevant information, so I'd appreciate any advice or links.

Thanks,
Preet
 

Attachments

  • weir.gif
    weir.gif
    5.8 KB · Views: 724
I found a really helpful book, which in one part, covers my situation in detail. I posted to recommend you check the book out (it's free due to copyright expiry).

The book is called "Hydraulics and its Applications" by A.H. Gibson

http://www.archive.org/details/hydraulicsapps00gibsrich
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K