Fluorescent Sample with Cuvette but not with Plate -- Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RooneyChemistry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluorescence Plate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a discrepancy in fluorescence readings between a cuvette and a 96-well plate in an assay. The cuvette shows fluorescence when measured in a fluorometer, while the same sample in a black, flat-bottomed, opaque 96-well plate does not. Key points include concerns about potential autofluorescence from the cuvette material, such as borosilicate glass or fused silica, and the type of fluorometer used, particularly whether it excites from above or below. It is noted that 96-well plate readers are generally less sensitive than traditional cuvette fluorometers, which could contribute to the difference in readings. Additionally, the positioning of the detector relative to the light source may introduce background noise affecting the results. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of instrument sensitivity and configuration in fluorescence assays.
RooneyChemistry
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Fluorescent Sample with Cuvette but not with Plate
I am doing an assay where the formed compound is fluorescent when I use a cuvette in a fluorometer, but not when I put the same sample into the well of a 96 well plate. Why is this?

The fluorometer reads from the top and the plates I am using are 96 well plates, black, flat-bottomed well, opaque bottom, fluotrac from Greiner.

Exc. 468 nm, Em. 572 nm.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What kind of fluorometer are you using? Exc from above or below?
 
Yeah we lack information here. What is the cuvette made out of? Fused silica? Borosilicate glass? Quartz? How about the well plate? I am also unsure what fluorometer excites from above. Most of them are sideways, where detection are perpendicular to the excitation path.
 
A 96 well fluoro reader couldn’t excite from the side, could it?
 
chemisttree said:
A 96 well fluoro reader couldn’t excite from the side, could it?
Maybe with tomography, LOL. A most expensive method.
 
Probably the sensitivity and different background noise of each instruments. Plate readers used in bio-assays are generally much less sensitive than traditional cuvette fluorometers. You could also get some background noise if your detector is not at a right angle from the light source.
 
Back
Top