Flux --> Apparent magnitude ( only 1 source )

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conversion of flux to apparent magnitude for a single source is defined by the equation Apparent Magnitude (m) = -2.5 log (Flux). This equation is derived from the standard definition of apparent magnitude, which requires a reference flux. To express the magnitude of a single source without a comparative reference, one can use the modified equation m_x = -2.5 log (F_x), where the reference flux is set to 1. This approach simplifies the calculation but does not eliminate the reference concept entirely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of apparent magnitude in astronomy
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of flux measurements in electromagnetic bands
  • Basic grasp of reference standards in scientific measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of reference flux in astronomical measurements
  • Study the implications of using logarithmic scales in data representation
  • Explore the standard reference flux tables for various electromagnetic bands
  • Learn about the relationship between flux and brightness in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in understanding the relationship between flux and apparent magnitude in single-source observations.

SpaceNerdz
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Hi guys,

I've seen a lot of textbooks converting between 2 apparent magnitudes to the ratio of 2 fluxes. But I just want to know how to convert 1 ( ONE, UNO , 1, NOT 2 ) flux to 1 ( ONE, UNO, 1, NOT 2 ) 1 Apparent Magnitude. I think I saw my professor wrote this down, but am not sure . Is this correct :

Apparent Magnitude (m) = -2.5 log (Flux)

Again, I want to stress that I only want to know the magnitude/flux of 1 ( ONE, UNO , 1, NOT 2 ) source, and I don't want to / don't care / really don't care about 2 sources with different magnitudes/ have absolutely no information on any other reference magnitude from another source.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi SpaceNerdz,

Unfortunately, your request is in the same category as asking for a stick with just one end.

That is to say, the scale of apparent magnitude is by definition a scale that uses a fixed reference flux for its zero point.
To put it another way, magnitude X in EM band Y tells you how much weaker/stronger is the flux of the observed star when compared to a star with flux Z.

The closest you can get to "eliminating" the reference from the equation is to use units of flux where the m=0 reference flux is equal to 1, and flux of the target star is expressed as a fraction of the reference.
In such case the equation:

##m_x-m_0= -2.5 log (F_x/F_0)##

reduces to

##m_x= -2.5 log (F_x)##

since ##m_0=0## and ##F_0=1##

So, say, if the target star had 10 times the flux of the reference in a given band, you'd get apparent magnitude:

##m_x= -2.5 log (10)=-2.5##

Still that is just visually hiding the reference.

This link has got a table of standard reference fluxes for various bands:
http://www.astro.utoronto.ca/~patton/astro/mags.html
(the "photon flux" table half way down)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Nugatory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K