Flux Density (Jy) to Luminosity when wavelength is involved

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on converting flux density in Janskys (Jy) to luminosity while accounting for wavelength. The user employs the luminosity formula 4πR² * integral_flux_density but struggles with unit conversions between frequency and wavelength. A key correction factor derived from the relationship between Jy and frequency is identified, specifically the factor of 10^-26, which plays a crucial role in achieving accurate luminosity calculations. The user successfully resolves their issue after correcting their implementation of the factor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of flux density in Janskys (Jy) and its units (W m-2 Hz-1)
  • Familiarity with the luminosity formula 4πR² * integral_flux_density
  • Knowledge of the relationship between frequency (ν) and wavelength (λ)
  • Basic calculus for handling integrals and derivatives in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conversion between flux density (Jy) and luminosity in astrophysics
  • Study the derivation and application of correction factors in spectral analysis
  • Learn about the implications of the speed of light (c) in astrophysical calculations
  • Explore the use of spreadsheets for data analysis in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students involved in spectral analysis and luminosity calculations, particularly those working with flux density measurements in Janskys.

Aiveenoka
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I think my problem may be a little trivial however I have been stuck on it for quite some time. I have plots of flux density (Jy) versus wavelength in order to look at a particular forbidden line. I want to find the luminosity of the line, however as I am dealing with Jy [W/(m^2 Hz)] I do not know how to deal with the frequency unit.

I am using the luminosity formula 4*pi*R^2*integral_flux_density. I am only looking at the main bit of the spectrum which I circle in the attached image.

I attempted to handle the Hz by multiplying my integral_flux_density by a correction value (s*λ^2)/c where s is the sampling value (the wavelength difference divided by the number of values) and c the speed of light. However the units do not work out.
I came up with my correction value based on:
Janksy unit = W m^-2 Hz^-1 (ignoring the 10^-26)
This is the same as dF/dv where v is nu the frequency symbol

I need dF/dv to go to dF/dλ

v=c/λ -> dv = - (c/λ^2) *dL

dF/dλ = dF/dv * dv/dλ

dF/dλ = - dF/dv * c/λ^2

dF/d\nu = -dF/dλ * (λ^2)/c

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
A :)
 

Attachments

  • Aiveenoka_spectrum.png
    Aiveenoka_spectrum.png
    10.2 KB · Views: 756
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That looks fine.

For each sampling between λ and Δλ, you have a frequency range between c/λ and c/(λ+Δλ) ≈ c/λ (1-Δλ/λ) which corresponds to a spectral width of cΔλ/λ^2. This has a unit of Hz, you can multipliy it with Jy to get W/m^2 for that sampling point, and sum over all points.
 
Thank you for your response, mfb. Your reply makes sense to me.
I realized I'd been implementing the correction factor wrongly. However I still cannot achieve reasonable answers. For this source (T Tau) I know that M-dot must be (or at least close to) 1E-6 and I am presently obtaining many values, but the one with the most accurate calculation is 10^20...

I attach the spreadsheet of this work to see if anything can be spotted. The green flux densities correspond to the circled area in my previous attachment of the image of my spectra.

A :)
 
I don't see an attachment.

Janksy unit = W m^-2 Hz^-1 (ignoring the 10^-26)
Maybe there is your factor of 10^26?
 
I think you are right! I had tried that before but in vain, however like I said I had been implementing the correction factor wrong. I shall try again right now and let you know and if needs be I'll actually attach the document this time, sorry about that.
Thank you,
A
 
It works! You're brilliant :) Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K