Flux Integral Help through abnormal cone

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the flux of the vector field F = x² i + z j + y k out of a closed cone defined by the equation x = sqrt(y² + z²) for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1. The user seeks guidance on adapting the flux formula typically used for surfaces defined as z = f(x,y) to the given surface defined as x = f(y,z). Key suggestions include using polar coordinates in the yz-plane for parametrization and ensuring the correct orientation of the outward normals for the closed cone. The recommended approach simplifies the integral significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and flux calculations
  • Familiarity with surface parametrization techniques
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates in the yz-plane
  • Proficiency in multivariable calculus, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Study parametrization of surfaces in three-dimensional space
  • Explore the application of polar coordinates in different planes
  • Review the divergence theorem and its applications in flux calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working on problems involving flux calculations through complex surfaces, particularly those involving conical shapes and vector fields.

mgibson
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

The problem requires me to calculate the flux of F=x^2 i + z j + y k out of the closed cone, x=sqrt(y^2 + z^2) with x between 0 and 1.

I am having trouble approaching this problem because most of the problems I have done give the curve as z=f(x,y) instead of x=f(y,z) and I am therefore confused as to how to apply the below equation.

Homework Equations



For the flux through a surface given by z=f(x,y)

Flux = int(F . dA) = int( [ F(x,y, f(x,y)) dot (-df/dx i - df/dy j + k) ]dxdy

where df/dx is the partial derivative of f with respect to x and df/dy is the partial derivative of f with respect to y.

How can I modify/apply this formula (if I even can) when given a surface as a function of x=f(y,z) as opposed to z=f(x,y) to find the flux through the horizontally opening cone?

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried putting f in terms of z and going that route but ran into some nasty integrals.

I tried replacing z with x and x with z (for F and f) as to simulate the same vector field and cone in a way that better applied to the given formula but once again ran into some nasty integrals.

Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have x= f(y,z) rather than z= f(x,y), then just swap x and z!
With x= f(y,z), x- f(y,z)= 0 can be treated as a level curve for a function whose gradient is then normal to the surface. That is, (\vec{i}- \partial f/\partial y \vec{j}- \partial f/\partial z\vec{k})dydz is the vector differential of surface area.

You can parametrize x= \sqrt{y^2+ z^2} by taking y= r cos(\theta), z= r sin(\theta)- in other words, use polar coordinates but in the yz-plane rather than the xy-plane. The equation of the cone becomes x= r so the position vector for any point on the plane is \vec{r}= r\vec{i}+ r cos(\theta)\vec{j}+ r sin(\theta)\vec{k}.

Then \vec{r}_r= \vec{i}+ cos(\theta)\vec{j}+ sin(\theta)\vec{k}, \vec{r}_\theta= -r sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ r cos(\theta)\vec{k} and the "fundamental vector product, their cross product, is r\vec{i}- r cos(\theta)\vec{j}- r sin(\theta)\vec{k}. Since you said the "flux out of the closed cone", you want this oriented by the outward pointing normals and so the vector differential of surface area is d\vec{\sigma}= (-\vec{i}+ cos(\theta)\vec{j}+ sin(\theta)\vec{k})r dr d\theta.

In this parameterization, F(x,y,z)= x^2\vec{i}+ z\vec{j}+ y\vec{k}= + r sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ r cos(\theta)\vec{k}. I think that gives a very simple integral.

Oh, and since this is a "closed cone", don't forget to integrate over the x= 1 base.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K